Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

MIG 2012:2

En migrationsdomstols utredningsskyldighet har ansetts aktualiserad när den utlänning målet rör till domstolen gett in ett läkarintyg som…

En migrationsdomstols utredningsskyldighet har ansetts aktualiserad när den utlänning målet rör till domstolen gett in ett läkarintyg som indikerar att han eller hon i hemlandet kan ha varit utsatt för tortyr.

The decision in three points

  1. What the court said

    En migrationsdomstols utredningsskyldighet har ansetts aktualiserad när den utlänning målet rör till domstolen gett in ett läkarintyg som indikerar att han eller hon i hemlandet kan ha varit utsatt för tortyr.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Migration Court of Appeal, 2012. Applies Utlänningslagen.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Migration Court of Appeal
  • Applies one statute
  • 557 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about family and migration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2012-2/manifest.json

    Court
    Migration Court of Appeal
    Decided
    2012-01-20
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr UM 4609-10

    • 4 kap. 1 § och 2 § utlänningslagen (2005:716)
    Migrationsöverdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2012-01-20Date of decision according to MigrationsöverdomstolenMigrationsöverdomstolen
    2006-03-31Applied statute in force: SFS 2005:716Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    MIG 2012:2, En migrationsdomstols utredningsskyldighet har ansetts aktualiserad när den utlänning målet rör till domstolen gett in ett läkarintyg som indikerar att han eller hon i hemlandet kan ha varit utsatt för tortyr.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2012-2 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:e472a4b640181e3f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    sha256:
    e472a4b640181e3f072e2b58b758cbe904a1633b767421d4c8d44e4cc7b54dfa
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Migrationsöverdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.