Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

The data engine is updated daily with thousands of new legal data points that strengthen society's decision support

HFD 2026 ref. 23

HFD 2026 ref. 23, Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden (2026)

Judgment of Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden, 2026. Statutes applied: Kommunallag. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Laglighetsprövning. Fullmäktiges beslut att godkänna kommunstyrelsens årsredovisning, trots att den saknade vissa obligatoriska uppgifter, har inte ansetts strida mot lag eller annan författning.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Laglighetsprövning.

  2. What the court said

    Fullmäktiges beslut att godkänna kommunstyrelsens årsredovisning, trots att den saknade vissa obligatoriska uppgifter, har inte ansetts strida mot lag eller annan författning.

  3. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden, 2026. Applies Kommunallagen.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
  • Applies one statute
  • 9 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about public administration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2026-23/manifest.json

    The full basis, ready-made

    CSRD reporting pack, total 186.25 € (about 201 USD)

    Evidence chain and hash per row included. One-time purchase, delivered instantly.

    Open the pack
    Court
    Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
    Decided
    2026-05-12
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr 2559-25

    Also searched as: HFD 2026 ref 23, HFD 2026:23, HFD 2026 23, Högsta förvaltningsdomstolens årsbok 2026 ref 23, Swedish judgment HFD 2026 ref 23, Case HFD 2026 ref. 23, HFD 2026 ref. 23 2026, 2559-25.

    • 11 kap. 19-21 §§, 13 kap. 2 § 1 och 4 § tredje stycket, 8 § första stycket 1 och 4 kommunallagen
    Hämta hela domen

    Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

    Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20

    Next check 2026-10-20 · Fresh

    See the open quality meter

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-09-05.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-09-05
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-10-05
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2026-05-12Date of decision according to Högsta förvaltningsdomstolenHögsta förvaltningsdomstolen
    2018-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 2017:725Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    Cite this row

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    HFD 2026 ref. 23, Laglighetsprövning. Fullmäktiges beslut att godkänna kommunstyrelsens årsredovisning, trots att den saknade vissa obligatoriska uppgifter, har inte ansetts strida mot lag eller annan författning.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2026-23 (hämtad 2026-09-26, bevis sha256:1047cf0191f2953f, bygge legal-2026-09-26).

    Machine addressHow to cite the platform
    sha256:
    1047cf0191f2953f8d13352408799b8d4cbf4859d10f6222b94d1f7d071a7934
    hämtad:
    2026-09-26
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-09-26
    officiell källa:
    https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/ea42e310-135c-4195-8030-8e7fd1326351

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.