Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

HFD 2014 ref. 55

Ett beslut att inte lämna ut information enligt 26 § personuppgiftslagen på grund av sekretess överklagas i den ordning som anvisas i…

Ett beslut att inte lämna ut information enligt 26 § personuppgiftslagen på grund av sekretess överklagas i den ordning som anvisas i offentlighets- och sekretesslagen.

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Ett beslut att inte lämna ut information enligt 26 § personuppgiftslagen på grund av sekretess överklagas i den ordning som anvisas i offentlighets- och sekretesslagen.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden, 2014. Applies OSL.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
  • Applies one statute
  • 54 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about public administration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

  • OSLSFS 2009:400

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2014-55/manifest.json

    Court
    Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
    Decided
    2014-10-02
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr 34-14

    • 6 kap. 8 § offentlighets- och sekretesslagen (2009:400)
    Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Statutes

    • OSL

      SFS 2009:400 · Public administration

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2014-10-02Date of decision according to Högsta förvaltningsdomstolenHögsta förvaltningsdomstolen
    2009-06-30Applied statute in force: SFS 2009:400Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    HFD 2014 ref. 55, Ett beslut att inte lämna ut information enligt 26 § personuppgiftslagen på grund av sekretess överklagas i den ordning som anvisas i offentlighets- och sekretesslagen.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2014-55 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:e6a14d4c4d3c8ce0, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    sha256:
    e6a14d4c4d3c8ce06c3e84fe58f06753aad5c5b7cbdbdc05f51e400b060310f5
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.