Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

The difference from an ordinary chatbot

Both answer fluently and both sound confident. The difference shows the moment you have to check the answer — or when the answer does not exist.

Share this page

Four differences you feel at work

  • The source: every row here comes from a published register with an address, not from a model's memory.
  • Repeatability: the same question returns the same rows today and in a month, with a hash to compare.
  • The date: every layer carries a read date, so you know the age of an entry instead of guessing.
  • The silence: if the row is missing, it is said outright. No row is invented to fill the gap.

What it does not do better

  • It does not redraft a contract for you and does not compose a filing.
  • It does not reason freely around an unregulated question.
  • It does not replace judgement — it makes judgement cheaper to support.

FAQ

Can it invent a provision?
No. An answer consists of rows that exist in the register. If the row is not there you get no row, and the answer says so.
Why does a stable answer matter over time?
Because material that shifts between two occasions cannot be reviewed, and therefore does not work as documentation.
Should I stop using other assistants?
No. Use them where language is the task, and this one where the source is the task.

Next step

Three ways to put the register to work in your own practice.

Start with your task