Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · MiCA

Article 82Providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients

CELEX 32023R1114 · Read on 2026-08-18

Share this page

Short answer

1. Crypto-asset service providers providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients shall conclude an agreement with their clients to specify their duties and their responsibilities. Such agreement shall include at least the following:

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/mica-2023-1114/artikel-82 · Short answer as data · Official text

MiCA, crypto-assets in short

Crypto-asset service providers need authorisation, and issuers need a white paper. Stablecoins have special rules.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. Crypto-asset service providers providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients shall conclude an agreement with their clients to specify their duties and their responsibilities. Such agreement shall include at least the following:

(a)

the identity of the parties to the agreement;

(b)

a description of the modalities of the transfer service provided;

(c)

a description of the security systems used by the crypto-asset service provider;

(d)

fees applied by the crypto-asset service provider;

(e)

the applicable law.

2. ESMA, in close cooperation with EBA, shall issue guidelines in accordance with Article 16 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 for crypto-asset service providers providing transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients as regards procedures and policies, including the rights of clients, in the context of transfer services for crypto-assets.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit