EU regulatory register · MiCA
Article 66Obligation to act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients
CELEX 32023R1114 · Read on 2026-08-18
Short answer
1. Crypto-asset service providers shall act honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of their clients and prospective clients.
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/mica-2023-1114/artikel-66 · Short answer as data · Official text
MiCA, crypto-assets in short
Crypto-asset service providers need authorisation, and issuers need a white paper. Stablecoins have special rules.
Source: NovaCopilot
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. Crypto-asset service providers shall act honestly, fairly and professionally in accordance with the best interests of their clients and prospective clients.
2. Crypto-asset service providers shall provide their clients with information that is fair, clear and not misleading, including in marketing communications, which shall be identified as such. Crypto-asset service providers shall not, deliberately or negligently, mislead a client in relation to the real or perceived advantages of any crypto-assets.
3. Crypto-asset service providers shall warn clients of the risks associated with transactions in crypto-assets.
When operating a trading platform for crypto-assets, exchanging crypto-assets for funds or other crypto-assets, providing advice on crypto-assets or providing portfolio management on crypto-assets, crypto-asset service providers shall provide their clients with hyperlinks to any crypto-asset white papers for the crypto-assets in relation to which they are providing those services.
4. Crypto-asset service providers shall make their policies on pricing, costs and fees publicly available, in a prominent place on their website.
5. Crypto-asset service providers shall make publicly available, in a prominent place on their website, information related to the principal adverse impacts on the climate and other environment-related adverse impacts of the consensus mechanism used to issue each crypto-asset in relation to which they provide services. That information may be obtained from the crypto-asset white papers.
6. ESMA, in cooperation with EBA, shall develop draft regulatory technical standards on the content, methodologies and presentation of information referred to in paragraph 5 in respect of the sustainability indicators in relation to adverse impacts on the climate and other environment‐related adverse impacts.
When developing the draft regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph, ESMA shall consider the various types of consensus mechanisms used to validate crypto-asset transactions, their incentive structures and the use of energy, renewable energy and natural resources, the production of waste and greenhouse gas emissions. ESMA shall update the regulatory technical standards in the light of regulatory and technological developments.
ESMA shall submit the draft regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph to the Commission by 30 June 2024.
Power is delegated to the Commission to supplement this Regulation by adopting the regulatory technical standards referred to in the first subparagraph of this paragraph in accordance with Articles 10 to 14 of Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010.
Follow-up questions
Knowledge card
- Applies
- casp: Act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients.
- Risk if ignored
- critical
- What to do
- Act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients.
- Deadline
- No fixed deadline in the register
card:eu:article:mica--art-66 · sha256 73933fbff939 · Source: NovaCopilot
Obligations, actions and sanctions
Article 66 · Role: casp
Act honestly, fairly and professionally in the best interests of clients.
Decision chain (JSON)
Sanction: Administrative penalties decided by the competent national authority under Article 111; amounts follow the Regulation and national law.
Summary of the obligation in the register; the official language versions on EUR-Lex are authoritative. Source: NovaCopilot
Risk, sanction and outcome
Art. 66 · casp
Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine, högst At least EUR 5 000 000 maximum for legal persons where Article 111 so requires · Authority: Competent national authority
Decisions applying the provision: none in the register
Full chain (JSON)
Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit