Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · MiCA

Article 64Withdrawal of authorisation of a crypto-asset service provider

CELEX 32023R1114 · Read on 2026-08-18

Share this page

Short answer

1. Competent authorities shall withdraw the authorisation of a crypto-asset service provider if the crypto-asset service provider does any of the following:

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/mica-2023-1114/artikel-64 · Short answer as data · Official text

MiCA, crypto-assets in short

Crypto-asset service providers need authorisation, and issuers need a white paper. Stablecoins have special rules.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. Competent authorities shall withdraw the authorisation of a crypto-asset service provider if the crypto-asset service provider does any of the following:

(a)

has not used its authorisation within 12 months of the date of the authorisation;

(b)

has expressly renounced its authorisation;

(c)

has not provided crypto-asset services for nine consecutive months;

(d)

has obtained its authorisation by irregular means, such as by making false statements in its application for authorisation;

(e)

no longer meets the conditions under which the authorisation was granted and has not taken the remedial action requested by the competent authority within the specified timeframe;

(f)

fails to have in place effective systems, procedures and arrangements to detect and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing in accordance with Directive (EU) 2015/849;

(g)

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit