Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · MiCA

Article 59Authorisation

CELEX 32023R1114 · Read on 2026-08-18

Share this page

Short answer

1. A person shall not provide crypto-asset services, within the Union, unless that person is:

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/mica-2023-1114/artikel-59 · Short answer as data · Official text

MiCA, crypto-assets in short

Crypto-asset service providers need authorisation, and issuers need a white paper. Stablecoins have special rules.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. A person shall not provide crypto-asset services, within the Union, unless that person is:

(a)

a legal person or other undertaking that has been authorised as crypto-asset service provider in accordance with Article 63; or

(b)

a credit institution, central securities depository, investment firm, market operator, electronic money institution, UCITS management company, or an alternative investment fund manager that is allowed to provide crypto-asset services pursuant to Article 60.

2. Crypto-asset service providers authorised in accordance with Article 63 shall have a registered office in a Member State where they carry out at least part of their crypto-asset services. They shall have their place of effective management in the Union and at least one of the directors shall be resident in the Union.

3. For the purposes of paragraph 1, point (a), other undertakings that are not legal persons shall only provide crypto-asset services if their legal form ensures a level of protection for third parties’ interests equivalent to that afforded by legal persons and if they are subject to equivalent prudential supervision appropriate to their legal form.

4. Crypto-asset service providers authorised in accordance with Article 63 shall at all times meet the conditions for their authorisation.

5. A person who is not a crypto-asset service provider shall not use a name, or a corporate name, or issue marketing communications or undertake any other process suggesting that it is a crypto-asset service provider or that is likely to create confusion in that respect.

6. Competent authorities that grant authorisations in accordance with Article 63 shall ensure that such authorisations specify the crypto-asset services that crypto-asset service providers are authorised to provide.

7. Crypto-asset service providers shall be allowed to provide crypto-asset services throughout the Union, either through the right of establishment, including through a branch, or through the freedom to provide services. Crypto-asset service providers that provide crypto-asset services on a cross-border basis shall not be required to have a physical presence in the territory of a host Member State.

8. Crypto-asset service providers seeking to add crypto-asset services to their authorisation as referred to in Article 63 shall request the competent authorities that granted their initial authorisation for an extension of their authorisation by complementing and updating the information referred to in Article 62. The request for extension shall be processed in accordance with Article 63.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

Knowledge card

Applies
casp: Obtain authorisation as a crypto-asset service provider, unless an exempt entity such as a credit institution notifies.
Risk if ignored
critical
What to do
Obtain authorisation as a crypto-asset service provider, unless an exempt entity such as a credit institution notifies.
Deadline
No fixed deadline in the register

card:eu:article:mica--art-59 · sha256 92fe6867d339 · Source: NovaCopilot

Obligations, actions and sanctions

  • Article 59 · Role: casp

    Obtain authorisation as a crypto-asset service provider, unless an exempt entity such as a credit institution notifies.

    Decision chain (JSON)

Sanction: Administrative penalties decided by the competent national authority under Article 111; amounts follow the Regulation and national law.

Summary of the obligation in the register; the official language versions on EUR-Lex are authoritative. Source: NovaCopilot

Risk, sanction and outcome

  • Art. 59 · casp

    Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine, högst At least EUR 5 000 000 maximum for legal persons where Article 111 so requires · Authority: Competent national authority

    Decisions applying the provision: none in the register

    Full chain (JSON)

Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit