EU regulatory register · MiCA
Article 48Requirements for the offer to the public or admission to trading of e-money tokens
CELEX 32023R1114 · Read on 2026-08-18
Short answer
1. A person shall not make an offer to the public or seek the admission to trading of an e-money token, within the Union, unless that person is the issuer of such e-money token and:
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/mica-2023-1114/artikel-48 · Short answer as data · Official text
MiCA, crypto-assets in short
Crypto-asset service providers need authorisation, and issuers need a white paper. Stablecoins have special rules.
Source: NovaCopilot
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. A person shall not make an offer to the public or seek the admission to trading of an e-money token, within the Union, unless that person is the issuer of such e-money token and:
(a)
is authorised as a credit institution or as an electronic money institution; and
(b)
has notified a crypto-asset white paper to the competent authority and has published that crypto-asset white paper in accordance with Article 51.
Notwithstanding the first subparagraph, upon the written consent of the issuer, other persons may offer to the public or seek the admission to trading of the e-money token. Those persons shall comply with Articles 50 and 53.
2. E-money tokens shall be deemed to be electronic money.
An e-money token that references an official currency of a Member State shall be deemed to be offered to the public in the Union.
3. Titles II and III of Directive 2009/110/EC shall apply with respect to e-money tokens unless otherwise stated in this Title.
4. Paragraph 1 of this Article shall not apply to issuers of e-money tokens exempted in accordance with Article 9(1) of Directive 2009/110/EC.
5. This Title, with the exception of paragraph 7 of this Article and Article 51, shall not apply in respect of e-money tokens exempt pursuant to Article 1(4) and (5) of Directive 2009/110/EC.
6. Issuers of e-money tokens shall, at least 40 working days before the date on which they intend to offer to the public those e-money tokens or seek their admission to trading, notify their competent authority of that intention.
7. Where paragraph 4 or 5 applies, the issuers of e-money tokens shall draw up a crypto-asset white paper and notify such crypto-asset white paper to the competent authority in accordance with Article 51.
Follow-up questions
Knowledge card
- Applies
- emt-issuer: Issue e-money tokens only as an authorised credit institution or electronic money institution and publish a white paper.
- Risk if ignored
- critical
- What to do
- Issue e-money tokens only as an authorised credit institution or electronic money institution and publish a white paper.
- Deadline
- No fixed deadline in the register
card:eu:article:mica--art-48 · sha256 76a72e663c23 · Source: NovaCopilot
Obligations, actions and sanctions
Article 48 · Role: emt-issuer
Issue e-money tokens only as an authorised credit institution or electronic money institution and publish a white paper.
Decision chain (JSON)
Sanction: Administrative penalties decided by the competent national authority under Article 111; amounts follow the Regulation and national law.
Summary of the obligation in the register; the official language versions on EUR-Lex are authoritative. Source: NovaCopilot
Risk, sanction and outcome
Art. 48 · emt-issuer
Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine, högst At least EUR 5 000 000 maximum for legal persons where Article 111 so requires · Authority: Competent national authority
Decisions applying the provision: none in the register
Full chain (JSON)
Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit