EU regulatory register · EHDS
Article 88Third-country transfer of non-personal electronic data
CELEX 32025R0327 · Read on 2026-08-31
Short answer
1. Non-personal electronic health data made available by health data access bodies to a health data user in a third country under a data permit issued pursuant to Article 68 of this Regulation or a health data request approved pursuant to Article 69 of this Regulation, to authorised participants in a third country or to an international organisation, and …
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/helsodata-2025-327/artikel-88 · Short answer as data · Official text
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. Non-personal electronic health data made available by health data access bodies to a health data user in a third country under a data permit issued pursuant to Article 68 of this Regulation or a health data request approved pursuant to Article 69 of this Regulation, to authorised participants in a third country or to an international organisation, and based on a natural person’s electronic health data falling within one of the categories referred to in Article 51 of this Regulation, shall be deemed highly sensitive within the meaning of Article 5(13) of Regulation (EU) 2022/868 where the transfer of such non-personal electronic data to third countries presents a risk of re-identification through means going beyond those reasonably likely to be used, in particular in view of the limited number of natural persons to whom those data relate, the fact that they are geographically scattered or the technological developments expected in the near future.
2. The protective measures for the categories of data mentioned in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be detailed in a delegated act referred to in Article 5(13) of Regulation (EU) 2022/868.
Follow-up questions
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit