EU regulatory register · EHDS
Article 37Technical documentation
CELEX 32025R0327 · Read on 2026-08-31
Short answer
1. Manufacturers shall draw up technical documentation before the EHR system is placed on the market or put into service, and shall keep that documentation up to date.
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/helsodata-2025-327/artikel-37 · Short answer as data · Official text
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. Manufacturers shall draw up technical documentation before the EHR system is placed on the market or put into service, and shall keep that documentation up to date.
2. The technical documentation referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall demonstrate that the EHR system complies with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II and provide market surveillance authorities with all the necessary information to assess the conformity of the EHR system with those requirements. That technical documentation shall contain, as a minimum, the elements set out in Annex III and a reference to the results obtained from a European digital testing environment referred to in Article 40.
3. The technical documentation referred to in paragraph 1 shall be drawn up in an official language of the Member State concerned or a language that is easily understandable in that Member State. Following a reasoned request from the market surveillance authority of a Member State, the manufacturer shall provide a translation of the relevant parts of the technical documentation into an official language of that Member State.
4. When a market surveillance authority requests the technical documentation or a translation of parts thereof from a manufacturer, the manufacturer shall provide such technical documentation or translation within 30 days of the date of the request, unless a shorter deadline is justified because of a serious and immediate risk. If the manufacturer does not comply with the requirements of paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article, the market surveillance authority may require it to have a test performed by an independent body at its own expense within a specified period in order to verify the conformity with the essential requirements laid down in Annex II and the common specifications referred to in Article 36.
Follow-up questions
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit