EU regulatory register · DORA
Article 38General investigations
CELEX 32022R2554 · Read on 2026-08-18
Short answer
1. In order to carry out its duties under this Regulation, the Lead Overseer, assisted by the joint examination team referred to in Article 40(1), may, where necessary, conduct investigations of critical ICT third-party service providers.
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/dora-2022-2554/artikel-38 · Short answer as data · Official text
DORA, digital operational resilience in short
Financial entities must manage ICT risk, report major ICT incidents, test resilience and govern ICT providers by contract.
- Who is covered by DORA?
- What does Article 30 require in ICT contracts?
- How fast must an ICT incident be reported?
Source: NovaCopilot
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. In order to carry out its duties under this Regulation, the Lead Overseer, assisted by the joint examination team referred to in Article 40(1), may, where necessary, conduct investigations of critical ICT third-party service providers.
2. The Lead Overseer shall have the power to:
(a)
examine records, data, procedures and any other material relevant to the execution of its tasks, irrespective of the medium on which they are stored;
(b)
take or obtain certified copies of, or extracts from, such records, data, documented procedures and any other material;
(c)
summon representatives of the critical ICT third-party service provider for oral or written explanations on facts or documents relating to the subject matter and purpose of the investigation and to record the answers;
(d)
interview any other natural or legal person who consents to be interviewed for the purpose of collecting information relating to the subject matter of an investigation;
(e)
request records of telephone and data traffic.
3. The officials and other persons authorised by the Lead Overseer for the purposes of the investigation referred to in paragraph 1 shall exercise their powers upon production of a written authorisation specifying the subject matter and purpose of the investigation.
That authorisation shall also indicate the periodic penalty payments provided for in Article 35(6) where the production of the required records, data, documented procedures or any other material, or the answers to questions asked to representatives of the ICT third-party service provider are not provided or are incomplete.
The article continues in the official text.
Follow-up questions
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit