EU regulatory register · DORA
Article 22Supervisory feedback
CELEX 32022R2554 · Read on 2026-08-18
Short answer
1. Without prejudice to the technical input, advice or remedies and subsequent follow-up which may be provided, where applicable, in accordance with national law, by the CSIRTs under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, the competent authority shall, upon receipt of the initial notification and of each report as referred to in Article 19(4), acknowledge receipt and …
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/dora-2022-2554/artikel-22 · Short answer as data · Official text
DORA, digital operational resilience in short
Financial entities must manage ICT risk, report major ICT incidents, test resilience and govern ICT providers by contract.
- Who is covered by DORA?
- What does Article 30 require in ICT contracts?
- How fast must an ICT incident be reported?
Source: NovaCopilot
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. Without prejudice to the technical input, advice or remedies and subsequent follow-up which may be provided, where applicable, in accordance with national law, by the CSIRTs under Directive (EU) 2022/2555, the competent authority shall, upon receipt of the initial notification and of each report as referred to in Article 19(4), acknowledge receipt and may, where feasible, provide in a timely manner relevant and proportionate feedback or high-level guidance to the financial entity, in particular by making available any relevant anonymised information and intelligence on similar threats, and may discuss remedies applied at the level of the financial entity and ways to minimise and mitigate adverse impact across the financial sector. Without prejudice to the supervisory feedback received, financial entities shall remain fully responsible for the handling and for consequences of the ICT-related incidents reported pursuant to Article 19(1).
2. The ESAs shall, through the Joint Committee, on an anonymised and aggregated basis, report yearly on major ICT-related incidents, the details of which shall be provided by competent authorities in accordance with Article 19(6), setting out at least the number of major ICT-related incidents, their nature and their impact on the operations of financial entities or clients, remedial actions taken and costs incurred.
The ESAs shall issue warnings and produce high-level statistics to support ICT threat and vulnerability assessments.
Follow-up questions
Guidance and secondary law
Authority guidance and the delegated or implementing acts that fill the article, with the primary source at the issuing body. Read 2026-08-31.
- Technical standard (RTS) · EBA/ESMA/EIOPA2024-01-17RTS/ITS on classification and reporting of major ICT-related incidents (JC 2023-85)
Classification thresholds and reporting formats for major ICT incidents under Articles 17-23.
Article 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit