Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-654/23Inteligo Media SA v Autoritatea Naţională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Decided
- 2025-11-13
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2025:871
- CELEX
- 62023CJ0654
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-654/23, C-654/23 2025, ECLI:EU:C:2025:871.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications sector – Directive 2002/58/EC – Article 13(1) and (2) – Unsolicited communications – Concept of communication ‘for the purposes of direct marketing’ – Obtaining electronic contact details ‘in the context of the sale of a product or a service’ – Registration on an online platform giving access to additional content – Sending of a daily newsletter via email – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Article 95 – Relationship with Directive 2002/58.
Interprets
- ePrivacy Directive: Directive 2002/58/EC32002L0058
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Articles in the ruling
The provisions are named in the court own keyword line. Read the article text here, the ruling at the source.
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-654-23
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit