Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-633/16Ernst & Young P/S v Konkurrencerådet

Decided
2018-05-31
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2018:371
CELEX
62016CJ0633
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

Also searched as: Case C-633/16, C-633/16 2018, ECLI:EU:C:2018:371.

The court's own keywords

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Control of concentrations of undertakings — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Article 7(1) — Implementation of a concentration prior to notification to the European Commission and declaration of compatibility with the common market — Prohibition — Scope — Concept of ‘concentration’ — Termination of a cooperation agreement with a third party by one of the merging undertakings.

Interprets

Core objects in the machine route

Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed

This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.

Source: NovaCopilot

Node map: relations between precedents

How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.

Reading relations …

Source: NovaCopilot

NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

Source: NovaCopilot

Get official document

Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works

Machine addresses

id
eu:c-633-16

Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit