Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-623/24 PUJ and Others v European Commission

Decided
2026-06-25
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2026:522
CELEX
62024CJ0623
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

Also searched as: Case C-623/24 P, C-623/24 P 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:522.

The court's own keywords

Appeal – Civil Service – Open Competition EPSO/AD/380/19 – Competition for the recruitment of administrators in the field of international cooperation and managing aid to non-EU countries – Repetition of written tests – Decision not to include the appellants’ names on the reserve list – Principle of equal treatment – Principle of correspondence between the administrative complaint and the judicial action – Action for annulment.

Interprets

    Core objects in the machine route

    Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed

    This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.

    Source: NovaCopilot

    Node map: relations between precedents

    How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.

    Reading relations …

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Source: NovaCopilot

    Get official document

    Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works

    Machine addresses

    id
    eu:c-623-24-p

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
    • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
    • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
    • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
    • Model card, source status and audit

    Model cardAudit