Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-434/24JD v Ministerul Agriculturii şi Dezvoltării Rurale – Agenţia de Plăţi şi Intervenţie pentru Agricultură Centrul Judeţean Bistriţa-Năsăud
- Decided
- 2026-03-26
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2026:247
- CELEX
- 62024CJ0434
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-434/24, C-434/24 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:247.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Agriculture – Common agricultural policy – European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) – Single area payment scheme – Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 – Article 32(2) and (4) – Eligible hectare – Article 36(5) – Hectares at the farmer’s disposal – National legislation requiring the production of a lease agreement relating to the agricultural area – Annulment with retroactive effect of that agreement on account of an irregularity in the award procedure which cannot be attributed to that farmer – Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 – Article 63(1) – Eligibility of the application.
Interprets
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-434-24
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit