Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-248/16Austria Asphalt GmbH & Co OG v Bundeskartellanwalt

Decided
2017-09-07
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2017:643
CELEX
62016CJ0248
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

Also searched as: Case C-248/16, C-248/16 2017, ECLI:EU:C:2017:643.

The court's own keywords

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Competition — Concentrations between undertakings — Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Article 3(1)(b) and (4) — Scope — Definition of ‘concentration’ — Change in the form of control of an existing undertaking which, previously exclusive, becomes joint — Creation of a joint venture performing on a lasting basis all the functions of an autonomous economic entity.

Interprets

Core objects in the machine route

Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed

This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.

Source: NovaCopilot

Node map: relations between precedents

How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.

Reading relations …

Source: NovaCopilot

NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

Source: NovaCopilot

Get official document

Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works

Machine addresses

id
eu:c-248-16

Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit