Agent · penningtvattsdirektivet-2024-1640-22
AMLD6 artikel 22: Responses to requests for information
What is an agent? Agents execute decisions.
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
Also searched as: Directive (EU) 2024/1640 article 22
CELEX 32024L1640 · 2026-08-31 · Weight 67 · minimal-risk
OpenOpen reading. No metering is planned for this class.
- What this page is
- Agent, AMLD6 artikel 22
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-31Expired
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does AMLD6 Article 22 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
According to NovaCopilot (object nc:en:agent:penningtvattsdirektivet-2024-1640:artikel-22): AMLD6 Article 22 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 4 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 addressed to the Member States, no direct obligation for businesses, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-31 against CELEX 32024L1640. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision. Source: NovaCopilot, nc:en:agent:penningtvattsdirektivet-2024-1640:artikel-22.
AMLD6 Article 22Official text
- Source reference registered, source text not re-verified
- Paragraph 1 addressed to the Member States, no direct obligation for businesses. 1. Member States shall ensure that FIUs are able to respond in a timely manner to reasoned requests for information justified by concerns relating to money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing by the competent authorities referred to in Article 2(1), points (44)(c) and (d), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 in their respective Member State where that information is already held by the FIU and is neces…
- Paragraph 2 applies. Where there are objective grounds for assuming that the provision of such information would have a negative impact on ongoing investigations or analyses, or, in exceptional circumstances, where disclosure of the information would be clearly disproportionate to the legitimate interests of a natural or legal person or irrelevant with regard to the purposes for which it has been requested, the FIU shall not be obliged t…
- Paragraph 3 applies. In such cases, the FIU shall provide the reasons in writing to the requesting authority.
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 addressed to the Member States, no direct obligation for businesses
1. Member States shall ensure that FIUs are able to respond in a timely manner to reasoned requests for information justified by concerns relating to money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing by the competent authorities referred to in Article 2(1), points (44)(c) and (d), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 in their respective Member State where that information is already held by the FIU and is neces…
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
Where there are objective grounds for assuming that the provision of such information would have a negative impact on ongoing investigations or analyses, or, in exceptional circumstances, where disclosure of the information would be clearly disproportionate to the legitimate interests of a natural or legal person or irrelevant with regard to the purposes for which it has been requested, the FIU shall not be obliged t…
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
In such cases, the FIU shall provide the reasons in writing to the requesting authority.
Paragraph 3
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)
Paragraph 4 addressed to authorities, no direct obligation for businesses
2. Competent authorities shall provide feedback to the FIU about the use made of, and the usefulness of, the information provided in accordance with this Article and Article 19(3), and about the outcome of actions taken and of investigations performed on the basis of that information. Such feedback shall be provided as soon as possible and in any case, in an aggregated form, at least on an annual basis, in such a way…
Paragraph 4
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. Member States shall ensure that FIUs are able to respond in a timely manner to reasoned requests for information justified by concerns relating to money laundering, its predicate offences or terrorist financing by the competent authorities referred to in Article 2(1), points (44)(c) and (d), of Regulation (EU) 2024/1624 in their respective Member State where that information is already held by the FIU and is necessary on a case-by-case basis. The decision on conducting the dissemination of information shall remain with the FIU.
- 2Where there are objective grounds for assuming that the provision of such information would have a negative impact on ongoing investigations or analyses, or, in exceptional circumstances, where disclosure of the information would be clearly disproportionate to the legitimate interests of a natural or legal person or irrelevant with regard to the purposes for which it has been requested, the FIU shall not be obliged to comply with the request for information.
- 3In such cases, the FIU shall provide the reasons in writing to the requesting authority.
- 42. Competent authorities shall provide feedback to the FIU about the use made of, and the usefulness of, the information provided in accordance with this Article and Article 19(3), and about the outcome of actions taken and of investigations performed on the basis of that information. Such feedback shall be provided as soon as possible and in any case, in an aggregated form, at least on an annual basis, in such a way as to allow the FIU to improve its operational analysis function.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32024L1640 art. 22, Responses to requests for information. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/penningtvattsdirektivet-2024-1640/artikel-22 (hämtad 2026-08-31, bevis sha256:12e1ea7f3fcc5c84, bygge legal-2026-11-02).