Agent · institutions-2018-1725-64
EUDPR artikel 64: Right to an effective judicial remedy
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32018R1725 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 62 · minimal-risk
OpenOpen reading. No metering is planned for this class.
- What this page is
- Agent, EUDPR artikel 64
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-18Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does EUDPR Article 64 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
EUDPR Article 64 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 3 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-18 against CELEX 32018R1725. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
EUDPR Article 64Checked against the publisher 2026-08-18Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to hear all disputes relating to the provisions of this Regulation, including claims for damages.
- Paragraph 2 applies. 2. Actions against decisions of the European Data Protection Supervisor, including decisions under Article 63(3), shall be brought before the Court of Justice.
- Paragraph 3 applies. 3. The Court of Justice shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review administrative fines referred to in Article 66. It may cancel, reduce or increase those fines within the limits of Article 66.
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to hear all disputes relating to the provisions of this Regulation, including claims for damages.
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. Actions against decisions of the European Data Protection Supervisor, including decisions under Article 63(3), shall be brought before the Court of Justice.
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
3. The Court of Justice shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review administrative fines referred to in Article 66. It may cancel, reduce or increase those fines within the limits of Article 66.
Paragraph 3
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to hear all disputes relating to the provisions of this Regulation, including claims for damages.
- 22. Actions against decisions of the European Data Protection Supervisor, including decisions under Article 63(3), shall be brought before the Court of Justice.
- 33. The Court of Justice shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review administrative fines referred to in Article 66. It may cancel, reduce or increase those fines within the limits of Article 66.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32018R1725 art. 64, Right to an effective judicial remedy. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/institutions-2018-1725/artikel-64 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:6e3c9aa71f086a2f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).