Agent · institutions-2018-1725-64
EUDPR artikel 64: Right to an effective judicial remedy
Strukturelt tre: artikkelens egne punkter, ordrett.
CELEX 32018R1725 · 2026-08-18 · Vekt 62 · minimal-risk
OpenOpen reading. No metering is planned for this class.
- Hva siden er
- Agent, EUDPR artikel 64
- Lest mot offisiell kilde
- 2026-08-18Fersk
- Ansvarlig utgiver
- ExploreWorld Legal, redaksjonenAnsvarsposisjon
Kort svar
What does EUDPR Article 64 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
EUDPR Article 64 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 3 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-18 against CELEX 32018R1725. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
EUDPR Article 64Lest mot utgiveren 2026-08-18Offisiell tekst
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to hear all disputes relating to the provisions of this Regulation, including claims for damages.
- Paragraph 2 applies. 2. Actions against decisions of the European Data Protection Supervisor, including decisions under Article 63(3), shall be brought before the Court of Justice.
- Paragraph 3 applies. 3. The Court of Justice shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review administrative fines referred to in Article 66. It may cancel, reduce or increase those fines within the limits of Article 66.
En kildehenvisning, ikke juridisk rådgivning.
Jurisdiksjon
Samme agent, lest med ett lands øyne.
Inndata
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3)
Regeltre
Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to hear all disputes relating to the provisions of this Regulation, including claims for damages.
Punkt 1
Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. Actions against decisions of the European Data Protection Supervisor, including decisions under Article 63(3), shall be brought before the Court of Justice.
Punkt 2
Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
3. The Court of Justice shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review administrative fines referred to in Article 66. It may cancel, reduce or increase those fines within the limits of Article 66.
Punkt 3
Hvis ingen regel treffer: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
Artikkelteksten som ble lest
- 11. The Court of Justice shall have jurisdiction to hear all disputes relating to the provisions of this Regulation, including claims for damages.
- 22. Actions against decisions of the European Data Protection Supervisor, including decisions under Article 63(3), shall be brought before the Court of Justice.
- 33. The Court of Justice shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review administrative fines referred to in Article 66. It may cancel, reduce or increase those fines within the limits of Article 66.
Opphav
Grensesnitt
Hasher
Artefakter
Ingen rådgivning. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Sitering: 32018R1725 art. 64, Right to an effective judicial remedy. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/institutions-2018-1725/artikel-64 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:6e3c9aa71f086a2f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).