Agent · gdpr-2016-679-78
GDPR artikel 78: Right to an effective judicial remedy against a supervisory authority
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32016R0679 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 84 · minimal-risk
ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.
- What this page is
- Agent, GDPR artikel 78
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-18Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does GDPR Article 78 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
GDPR Article 78 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 4 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-18 against CELEX 32016R0679. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
GDPR Article 78Checked against the publisher 2026-08-18Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each natural or legal person shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a legally binding decision of a supervisory authority concerning them.
- Paragraph 2 applies. 2. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each data subject shall have the right to a an effective judicial remedy where the supervisory authority which is competent pursuant to Articles 55 and 56 does not handle a complaint or does not inform the data subject within three months on the progress or outcome of the complaint lodged pursuant to Article 77.
- Paragraph 3 applies. 3. Proceedings against a supervisory authority shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established.
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each natural or legal person shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a legally binding decision of a supervisory authority concerning them.
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each data subject shall have the right to a an effective judicial remedy where the supervisory authority which is competent pursuant to Articles 55 and 56 does not handle a complaint or does not inform the data subject within three months on the progress or outcome of the complaint lodged pursuant to Article 77.
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
3. Proceedings against a supervisory authority shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established.
Paragraph 3
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)
Paragraph 4 applies
4. Where proceedings are brought against a decision of a supervisory authority which was preceded by an opinion or a decision of the Board in the consistency mechanism, the supervisory authority shall forward that opinion or decision to the court.
Paragraph 4
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each natural or legal person shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a legally binding decision of a supervisory authority concerning them.
- 22. Without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, each data subject shall have the right to a an effective judicial remedy where the supervisory authority which is competent pursuant to Articles 55 and 56 does not handle a complaint or does not inform the data subject within three months on the progress or outcome of the complaint lodged pursuant to Article 77.
- 33. Proceedings against a supervisory authority shall be brought before the courts of the Member State where the supervisory authority is established.
- 44. Where proceedings are brought against a decision of a supervisory authority which was preceded by an opinion or a decision of the Board in the consistency mechanism, the supervisory authority shall forward that opinion or decision to the court.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32016R0679 art. 78, Right to an effective judicial remedy against a supervisory authority. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/gdpr-2016-679/artikel-78 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:913ada422d2f4078, bygge legal-2026-08-25).