Agent · gdpr-2016-679-41
GDPR artikel 41: Monitoring of approved codes of conduct
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32016R0679 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 92 · minimal-risk
PremiumHand written or high weight rule tree. Metered per call at the edge once metering is switched on, at the same address and with the same answer as today.
- What this page is
- Agent, GDPR artikel 41
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-18Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does GDPR Article 41 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
GDPR Article 41 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 14 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-18 against CELEX 32016R0679. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
GDPR Article 41Checked against the publisher 2026-08-18Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. Without prejudice to the tasks and powers of the competent supervisory authority under Articles 57 and 58, the monitoring of compliance with a code of conduct pursuant to Article 40 may be carried out by a body which has an appropriate level of expertise in relation to the subject-matter of the code and is accredited for that purpose by the competent supervisory authority.
- Paragraph 2 applies. 2. A body as referred to in paragraph 1 may be accredited to monitor compliance with a code of conduct where that body has:
- Paragraph 3 applies. (a)
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. Without prejudice to the tasks and powers of the competent supervisory authority under Articles 57 and 58, the monitoring of compliance with a code of conduct pursuant to Article 40 may be carried out by a body which has an appropriate level of expertise in relation to the subject-matter of the code and is accredited for that purpose by the competent supervisory authority.
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. A body as referred to in paragraph 1 may be accredited to monitor compliance with a code of conduct where that body has:
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
(a)
Paragraph 3
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)
Paragraph 4 applies
demonstrated its independence and expertise in relation to the subject-matter of the code to the satisfaction of the competent supervisory authority;
Paragraph 4
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)
Paragraph 5 applies
(b)
Paragraph 5
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)
Paragraph 6 applies
established procedures which allow it to assess the eligibility of controllers and processors concerned to apply the code, to monitor their compliance with its provisions and to periodically review its operation;
Paragraph 6
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 7)
Paragraph 7 applies
(c)
Paragraph 7
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 8)
Paragraph 8 applies
established procedures and structures to handle complaints about infringements of the code or the manner in which the code has been, or is being, implemented by a controller or processor, and to make those procedures and structures transparent to data subjects and the public; and
Paragraph 8
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 9)
Paragraph 9 applies
(d)
Paragraph 9
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 10)
Paragraph 10 applies
demonstrated to the satisfaction of the competent supervisory authority that its tasks and duties do not result in a conflict of interests.
Paragraph 10
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 11)
Paragraph 11 applies
3. The competent supervisory authority shall submit the draft criteria for accreditation of a body as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article to the Board pursuant to the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 63.
Paragraph 11
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 12)
Paragraph 12 applies
4. Without prejudice to the tasks and powers of the competent supervisory authority and the provisions of Chapter VIII, a body as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall, subject to appropriate safeguards, take appropriate action in cases of infringement of the code by a controller or processor, including suspension or exclusion of the controller or processor concerned from the code. It shall inform the comp…
Paragraph 12
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 13)
Paragraph 13 applies
5. The competent supervisory authority shall revoke the accreditation of a body as referred to in paragraph 1 if the conditions for accreditation are not, or are no longer, met or where actions taken by the body infringe this Regulation.
Paragraph 13
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 14)
Paragraph 14 applies
6. This Article shall not apply to processing carried out by public authorities and bodies.
Paragraph 14
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. Without prejudice to the tasks and powers of the competent supervisory authority under Articles 57 and 58, the monitoring of compliance with a code of conduct pursuant to Article 40 may be carried out by a body which has an appropriate level of expertise in relation to the subject-matter of the code and is accredited for that purpose by the competent supervisory authority.
- 22. A body as referred to in paragraph 1 may be accredited to monitor compliance with a code of conduct where that body has:
- 3(a)
- 4demonstrated its independence and expertise in relation to the subject-matter of the code to the satisfaction of the competent supervisory authority;
- 5(b)
- 6established procedures which allow it to assess the eligibility of controllers and processors concerned to apply the code, to monitor their compliance with its provisions and to periodically review its operation;
- 7(c)
- 8established procedures and structures to handle complaints about infringements of the code or the manner in which the code has been, or is being, implemented by a controller or processor, and to make those procedures and structures transparent to data subjects and the public; and
- 9(d)
- 10demonstrated to the satisfaction of the competent supervisory authority that its tasks and duties do not result in a conflict of interests.
- 113. The competent supervisory authority shall submit the draft criteria for accreditation of a body as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article to the Board pursuant to the consistency mechanism referred to in Article 63.
- 124. Without prejudice to the tasks and powers of the competent supervisory authority and the provisions of Chapter VIII, a body as referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article shall, subject to appropriate safeguards, take appropriate action in cases of infringement of the code by a controller or processor, including suspension or exclusion of the controller or processor concerned from the code. It shall inform the competent supervisory authority of such actions and the reasons for taking them.
- 135. The competent supervisory authority shall revoke the accreditation of a body as referred to in paragraph 1 if the conditions for accreditation are not, or are no longer, met or where actions taken by the body infringe this Regulation.
- 146. This Article shall not apply to processing carried out by public authorities and bodies.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32016R0679 art. 41, Monitoring of approved codes of conduct. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/gdpr-2016-679/artikel-41 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:5c10a5c12fa19ee1, bygge legal-2026-08-25).