Agent · datastyrningsforordningen-2022-868-28
DGA artikel 28: Right to an effective judicial remedy
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32022R0868 · 2026-08-31 · Weight 70 · minimal-risk
OpenOpen reading. No metering is planned for this class.
- What this page is
- Agent, DGA artikel 28
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-31Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does DGA Article 28 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
DGA Article 28 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 3 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-31 against CELEX 32022R0868. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
DGA Article 28Checked against the publisher 2026-08-31Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. Notwithstanding any administrative or other non-judicial remedies, any affected natural and legal persons shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy with regard to legally binding decisions referred to in Article 14 taken by the competent authorities for data intermediation services in the management, control and enforcement of the notification regime for data intermediation services providers and legall…
- Paragraph 2 applies. 2. Proceedings pursuant to this Article shall be brought before the courts or tribunals of the Member State of the competent authority for data intermediation services or the competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations against which the judicial remedy is sought individually or, where relevant, collectively by the representatives of one or more natural or legal persons.
- Paragraph 3 applies. 3. Where a competent authority for data intermediation services or a competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations fails to act on a complaint, any affected natural and legal persons shall, in accordance with national law, either have the right to an effective judicial remedy or access to review by an impartial body with the appropriate expertise.
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. Notwithstanding any administrative or other non-judicial remedies, any affected natural and legal persons shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy with regard to legally binding decisions referred to in Article 14 taken by the competent authorities for data intermediation services in the management, control and enforcement of the notification regime for data intermediation services providers and legall…
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. Proceedings pursuant to this Article shall be brought before the courts or tribunals of the Member State of the competent authority for data intermediation services or the competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations against which the judicial remedy is sought individually or, where relevant, collectively by the representatives of one or more natural or legal persons.
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
3. Where a competent authority for data intermediation services or a competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations fails to act on a complaint, any affected natural and legal persons shall, in accordance with national law, either have the right to an effective judicial remedy or access to review by an impartial body with the appropriate expertise.
Paragraph 3
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. Notwithstanding any administrative or other non-judicial remedies, any affected natural and legal persons shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy with regard to legally binding decisions referred to in Article 14 taken by the competent authorities for data intermediation services in the management, control and enforcement of the notification regime for data intermediation services providers and legally binding decisions referred to in Articles 19 and 24 taken by the competent authorities for the registration of data altruism organisations in the monitoring of recognised data altruism organisations.
- 22. Proceedings pursuant to this Article shall be brought before the courts or tribunals of the Member State of the competent authority for data intermediation services or the competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations against which the judicial remedy is sought individually or, where relevant, collectively by the representatives of one or more natural or legal persons.
- 33. Where a competent authority for data intermediation services or a competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations fails to act on a complaint, any affected natural and legal persons shall, in accordance with national law, either have the right to an effective judicial remedy or access to review by an impartial body with the appropriate expertise.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32022R0868 art. 28, Right to an effective judicial remedy. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/datastyrningsforordningen-2022-868/artikel-28 (hämtad 2026-08-31, bevis sha256:3e3a384459fde641, bygge legal-2026-08-25).