Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Hopp til innhold
Hopp til svaret

Agent · datastyrningsforordningen-2022-868-28

DGA artikel 28: Right to an effective judicial remedy

Strukturelt tre: artikkelens egne punkter, ordrett.

CELEX 32022R0868 · 2026-08-31 · Vekt 70 · minimal-risk

OpenOpen reading. No metering is planned for this class.

DGAOffisiell kilde

Hva siden er
Agent, DGA artikel 28
Lest mot offisiell kilde
2026-08-31Fersk
Ansvarlig utgiver
ExploreWorld Legal, redaksjonenAnsvarsposisjon

Jurisdiksjon

Samme agent, lest med ett lands øyne.

Inndata

  • in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
  • punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3)

Regeltre

  1. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)

    Paragraph 1 applies

    1. Notwithstanding any administrative or other non-judicial remedies, any affected natural and legal persons shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy with regard to legally binding decisions referred to in Article 14 taken by the competent authorities for data intermediation services in the management, control and enforcement of the notification regime for data intermediation services providers and legall…

    Punkt 1

  2. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)

    Paragraph 2 applies

    2. Proceedings pursuant to this Article shall be brought before the courts or tribunals of the Member State of the competent authority for data intermediation services or the competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations against which the judicial remedy is sought individually or, where relevant, collectively by the representatives of one or more natural or legal persons.

    Punkt 2

  3. Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)

    Paragraph 3 applies

    3. Where a competent authority for data intermediation services or a competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations fails to act on a complaint, any affected natural and legal persons shall, in accordance with national law, either have the right to an effective judicial remedy or access to review by an impartial body with the appropriate expertise.

    Punkt 3

Hvis ingen regel treffer: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

Artikkelteksten som ble lest

  1. 11. Notwithstanding any administrative or other non-judicial remedies, any affected natural and legal persons shall have the right to an effective judicial remedy with regard to legally binding decisions referred to in Article 14 taken by the competent authorities for data intermediation services in the management, control and enforcement of the notification regime for data intermediation services providers and legally binding decisions referred to in Articles 19 and 24 taken by the competent authorities for the registration of data altruism organisations in the monitoring of recognised data altruism organisations.
  2. 22. Proceedings pursuant to this Article shall be brought before the courts or tribunals of the Member State of the competent authority for data intermediation services or the competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations against which the judicial remedy is sought individually or, where relevant, collectively by the representatives of one or more natural or legal persons.
  3. 33. Where a competent authority for data intermediation services or a competent authority for the registration of data altruism organisations fails to act on a complaint, any affected natural and legal persons shall, in accordance with national law, either have the right to an effective judicial remedy or access to review by an impartial body with the appropriate expertise.

Opphav

treatyTFEU art. 288 (förordning)
act32022R0868
chapter
article28
paragraphs3
jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)
supervisor
national

Grensesnitt

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/datastyrningsforordningen-2022-868-28/run
methodGET
outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash
Kvote60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel
stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hasher

textsha256:320e2d310cdfa4da680b3b630c6d136020287ab9f6f710795bf09ec6f4c09aaa
scriptsha256:c2bf12eac9cfb53c5e7e4e70a23a75c831fe4fe008f47c756a0558ff1857a416
enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0
agentsha256:3a726e55d7744d5f0acf4e0845fb5f4a0c923d1c04d9ae92cac602b2d4fa6996
versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-08-25 / 3a726e55d7744d5f

Artefakter

Ingen rådgivning. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Sitering: 32022R0868 art. 28, Right to an effective judicial remedy. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/datastyrningsforordningen-2022-868/artikel-28 (hämtad 2026-08-31, bevis sha256:3e3a384459fde641, bygge legal-2026-08-25).