Agent · ai-act-2024-1689-101
AI Act artikel 101: Fines for providers of general-purpose AI models
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32024R1689 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk
ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.
- What this page is
- Agent, AI Act artikel 101
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-18Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does AI Act Article 101 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
AI Act Article 101 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 14 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-18 against CELEX 32024R1689. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
AI Act Article 101Checked against the publisher 2026-08-18Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. The Commission may impose on providers of general-purpose AI models fines not exceeding 3 % of their annual total worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year or EUR 15 000 000, whichever is higher., when the Commission finds that the provider intentionally or negligently:
- Paragraph 2 applies. (a)
- Paragraph 3 applies. infringed the relevant provisions of this Regulation;
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. The Commission may impose on providers of general-purpose AI models fines not exceeding 3 % of their annual total worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year or EUR 15 000 000, whichever is higher., when the Commission finds that the provider intentionally or negligently:
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
(a)
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
infringed the relevant provisions of this Regulation;
Paragraph 3
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)
Paragraph 4 applies
(b)
Paragraph 4
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)
Paragraph 5 applies
failed to comply with a request for a document or for information pursuant to Article 91, or supplied incorrect, incomplete or misleading information;
Paragraph 5
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)
Paragraph 6 applies
(c)
Paragraph 6
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 7)
Paragraph 7 applies
failed to comply with a measure requested under Article 93;
Paragraph 7
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 8)
Paragraph 8 applies
(d)
Paragraph 8
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 9)
Paragraph 9 applies
failed to make available to the Commission access to the general-purpose AI model or general-purpose AI model with systemic risk with a view to conducting an evaluation pursuant to Article 92.
Paragraph 9
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 10)
Paragraph 10 applies
In fixing the amount of the fine or periodic penalty payment, regard shall be had to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, taking due account of the principles of proportionality and appropriateness. The Commission shall also into account commitments made in accordance with Article 93(3) or made in relevant codes of practice in accordance with Article 56.
Paragraph 10
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 11)
Paragraph 11 applies
2. Before adopting the decision pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall communicate its preliminary findings to the provider of the general-purpose AI model and give it an opportunity to be heard.
Paragraph 11
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 12)
Paragraph 12 applies
3. Fines imposed in accordance with this Article shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
Paragraph 12
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 13)
Paragraph 13 applies
4. Information on fines imposed under this Article shall also be communicated to the Board as appropriate.
Paragraph 13
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 14)
Paragraph 14 applies
5. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions of the Commission fixing a fine under this Article. It may cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed.
Paragraph 14
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. The Commission may impose on providers of general-purpose AI models fines not exceeding 3 % of their annual total worldwide turnover in the preceding financial year or EUR 15 000 000, whichever is higher., when the Commission finds that the provider intentionally or negligently:
- 2(a)
- 3infringed the relevant provisions of this Regulation;
- 4(b)
- 5failed to comply with a request for a document or for information pursuant to Article 91, or supplied incorrect, incomplete or misleading information;
- 6(c)
- 7failed to comply with a measure requested under Article 93;
- 8(d)
- 9failed to make available to the Commission access to the general-purpose AI model or general-purpose AI model with systemic risk with a view to conducting an evaluation pursuant to Article 92.
- 10In fixing the amount of the fine or periodic penalty payment, regard shall be had to the nature, gravity and duration of the infringement, taking due account of the principles of proportionality and appropriateness. The Commission shall also into account commitments made in accordance with Article 93(3) or made in relevant codes of practice in accordance with Article 56.
- 112. Before adopting the decision pursuant to paragraph 1, the Commission shall communicate its preliminary findings to the provider of the general-purpose AI model and give it an opportunity to be heard.
- 123. Fines imposed in accordance with this Article shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive.
- 134. Information on fines imposed under this Article shall also be communicated to the Board as appropriate.
- 145. The Court of Justice of the European Union shall have unlimited jurisdiction to review decisions of the Commission fixing a fine under this Article. It may cancel, reduce or increase the fine imposed.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32024R1689 art. 101, Fines for providers of general-purpose AI models. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-101 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:ab51598472fa4218, bygge legal-2026-08-25).