NJA 2017 s. 256
En tingsrätt har avvisat ett rättegångsombud utan att parten eller ombudet fått tillfälle att yttra sig i frågan
En tingsrätt har avvisat ett rättegångsombud utan att parten eller ombudet fått tillfälle att yttra sig i frågan. Detta har ansetts utgöra ett rättegångsfel.
The decision in three points
What happened
En tingsrätt har avvisat ett rättegångsombud utan att parten eller ombudet fått tillfälle att yttra sig i frågan.
What the court said
Detta har ansetts utgöra ett rättegångsfel.
Why it matters
Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 2017.
Risk profile of the decision
MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.
- Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden
Relations of the decision in the graph
Statutes (0)
Questions (0)
Decisions (4)
Agent commands
- runCaseSummary()
The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.
- runLegalImpact()
Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.
- runObligationCheck()
Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.
- runProofVerify()
Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.
https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2017-s-256/manifest.json
- Court
- Supreme Court of Sweden
- Decided
- 2017-04-10
- Applies
- 0
Mål nr Ö 2778-16
- 2 kap. 11 § regeringsformen (1974:152)
- 12 kap. 2 § och 5 §, 49 kap. 14 § och 59 kap. 1 § rättegångsbalken (1942:740)
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.
Statutes
Case law read on 2026-08-29.
Change monitoring
The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| Publisher | Sveriges Domstolar |
| Last read | 2026-08-29 |
| Interval | Every 30 days |
| Next re-read | 2026-09-28 |
| Status | Checked against the publisher |
Row history
Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-29 | Row read against the courts' own register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| 2017-04-10 | Date of decision according to Högsta domstolen | Högsta domstolen |
Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.
Cite this row
The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.
NJA 2017 s. 256, En tingsrätt har avvisat ett rättegångsombud utan att parten eller ombudet fått tillfälle att yttra sig i frågan. Detta har ansetts utgöra ett rättegångsfel.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2017-s-256 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:19d655493c889ef5, bygge legal-2026-08-25).
- sha256:
- 19d655493c889ef598a1d78302b79c009d9d3eb0f2e2977fc54695b78426aebc
- hämtad:
- 2026-08-25
- source_confidence:
- official
- bygge:
- legal-2026-08-25
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.
The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.