Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

NovaCopilot's registers are reviewed daily against official sources

NJA 1997 s. 645

NJA 1997 s. 645, Supreme Court of Sweden (1997)

Judgment of Supreme Court of Sweden, 1997. Statutes applied: Lag om avtal och andra rättshandlingar på förmögenhetsrättens område, Föräldrabalk. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

En dom, varigenom en man förklarats ej vara far till ett barn som fötts i hans äktenskap, har inte ansetts böra medföra att ett tidigare arvskifte efter mannen, i vilket barnet deltagit som mannens bröstarvinge, skall förklaras ogiltigt.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What the court said

    En dom, varigenom en man förklarats ej vara far till ett barn som fötts i hans äktenskap, har inte ansetts böra medföra att ett tidigare arvskifte efter mannen, i vilket barnet deltagit som mannens bröstarvinge, skall förklaras ogiltigt.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 1997. Applies Avtalslagen, Föräldrabalken.

Related questions

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden
  • Applies 2 statutes
  • 470 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about transactions and competition, family and migration, and 1 question pages in the register rest on the same statute.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (2)

Decisions (8)

Agent commands

  • runCaseSummary()

    The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

  • runLegalImpact()

    Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

  • runObligationCheck()

    Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

  • runProofVerify()

    Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1997-s-645/manifest.json

NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

Common questions

What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

Source: NovaCopilot

NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

Court
Supreme Court of Sweden
Decided
1997-10-02
Applies
2

Mål nr T 2127-96

Also searched as: NJA 1997 s 645, NJA 1997:645, NJA 1997 645, Nytt juridiskt arkiv 1997 s 645, Swedish judgment NJA 1997 s 645, Case NJA 1997 s. 645, NJA 1997 s. 645 1997, T 2127-96.

  • 36 § lagen (1915:218) om avtal och andra rättshandlingar på förmögenhetsrättens område
  • 1 kap. 1 § föräldrabalken (1949:381)
Hämta hela domen

Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

Verified, unchanged

Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

See the open quality meter

Statutes

Case law

Case law read on 2026-09-05.

Change monitoring

The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

Change monitoring
FieldValue
RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
PublisherSveriges Domstolar
Last read2026-09-05
IntervalEvery 30 days
Next re-read2026-10-05
StatusRe-read scheduled
Open the register at the publisher

Row history

Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

Row history
DateEventSource
2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
1997-10-02Date of decision according to Högsta domstolenHögsta domstolen
1950-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1949:381Sveriges riksdag
1916-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1915:218Sveriges riksdag

Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

What changed this week, every Monday

A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Topics

Cite this row

The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

NJA 1997 s. 645, En dom, varigenom en man förklarats ej vara far till ett barn som fötts i hans äktenskap, har inte ansetts böra medföra att ett tidigare arvskifte efter mannen, i vilket barnet deltagit som mannens bröstarvinge, skall förklaras ogiltigt.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1997-s-645 (hämtad 2026-10-16, bevis sha256:012f0389a0b26115, bygge legal-2026-10-16).

Machine addressHow to cite the platform
sha256:
012f0389a0b26115dff8e1e034ca82cdd90071b3f25e21c92e5d61b32f6c5bc8
hämtad:
2026-10-16
source_confidence:
official
bygge:
legal-2026-10-16
officiell källa:
https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/1f0a0abd-f8b8-4a53-9cdd-f0539da6d30a

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.