Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

NJA 1994 s. 42

Av barnet anhängiggjord talan i resningsärendet har ansetts kunna fullföljas av barnets dödsbo

Resning har beviljats i faderskapsmål där HovR:n meddelat dom utan delgivning av vadeinlagan med motparter och utan huvudförhandling, trots att villkoren i 50 kap 8 § 2 st RB inte var uppfyllda. Av barnet anhängiggjord talan i resningsärendet har ansetts kunna fullföljas av barnets dödsbo.

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Resning har beviljats i faderskapsmål där HovR:n meddelat dom utan delgivning av vadeinlagan med motparter och utan huvudförhandling, trots att villkoren i 50 kap 8 § 2 st RB inte var uppfyllda.

  2. What the court said

    Av barnet anhängiggjord talan i resningsärendet har ansetts kunna fullföljas av barnets dödsbo.

  3. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 1994. Applies Föräldrabalken.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden
  • Applies one statute
  • 299 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about family and migration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-1994-s-42/manifest.json

    Court
    Supreme Court of Sweden
    Decided
    1994-02-10
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr Ö 903-91

    • 3 kap. 5 § föräldrabalken (1949:381)
    Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    1994-02-10Date of decision according to Högsta domstolenHögsta domstolen
    1950-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1949:381Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    NJA 1994 s. 42, Resning har beviljats i faderskapsmål där HovR:n meddelat dom utan delgivning av vadeinlagan med motparter och utan huvudförhandling, trots att villkoren i 50 kap 8 § 2 st RB inte var uppfyllda. Av barnet anhängiggjord talan i resningsärendet har ansetts kunna fullföljas av barnets dödsbo.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-1994-s-42 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:aced08a52b3f2494, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    sha256:
    aced08a52b3f24945a69c7669a811167121c4a5855a8126f47ddda98ca03807a
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.