Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

MD 2005:37

MD 2005:37, Market Court, until 2016 (2005)

Judgment of Market Court, until 2016, 2005. Statutes applied: Lag om distansavtal och avtal utanför affärslokaler. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Ett bolag har vid sin marknadsföring av telefonabonnemang använt sig av dels telefonförsäljning, dels sin webbplats. Därvid har bolaget givit konsumenten intrycket att han vid beställningen av tjänsten och följaktligen före avtalsslut kan avsäga sig sin ångerrätt. Detta har ansetts vara otillbörligt eftersom ångerfristen vid den tidpunkten inte har börjat löpa.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Ett bolag har vid sin marknadsföring av telefonabonnemang använt sig av dels telefonförsäljning, dels sin webbplats.

  2. What the court said

    Detta har ansetts vara otillbörligt eftersom ångerfristen vid den tidpunkten inte har börjat löpa.

  3. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Market Court, until 2016, 2005. Applies Distansavtalslagen.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Market Court, until 2016
  • Applies one statute
  • 10 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about consumer law.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/md-2005-37/manifest.json

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Common questions

    What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

    Court
    Market Court, until 2016
    Decided
    2005-12-16
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr 2005-37

    Also searched as: MD 2005 37, Marknadsdomstolen 2005:37, Swedish judgment MD 2005:37, Case MD 2005:37, MD 2005:37 2005, 2005-37, Case 2005-37.

    • 2 kap. 4 §, 6 §, 7 §, 8 §, 9 § och 10 § distans- och hemförsäljningslagen (2005:59)
    Hämta hela domen

    Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

    Marknadsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Re-read scheduled

    Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

    See the open quality meter

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-09-05.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-09-05
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-10-05
    StatusRe-read scheduled
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2005-12-16Date of decision according to MarknadsdomstolenMarknadsdomstolen
    2005-04-01Applied statute in force: SFS 2005:59Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    What changed this week, every Monday

    A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

    Topics

    Cite this row

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    MD 2005:37, Ett bolag har vid sin marknadsföring av telefonabonnemang använt sig av dels telefonförsäljning, dels sin webbplats. Därvid har bolaget givit konsumenten intrycket att han vid beställningen av tjänsten och följaktligen före avtalsslut kan avsäga sig sin ångerrätt. Detta har ansetts vara otillbörligt eftersom ångerfristen vid den tidpunkten inte har börjat löpa.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/md-2005-37 (hämtad 2026-10-25, bevis sha256:f23aab991b9ea36d, bygge legal-2026-10-25).

    Machine addressHow to cite the platform
    sha256:
    f23aab991b9ea36d6c8ec338044df4d106c321df66900dc9013ef349620d621c
    hämtad:
    2026-10-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-10-25
    officiell källa:
    https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/77f02d02-03d6-43be-af83-2b571e3f92e9

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Marknadsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.