Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-511/25Ministerstvo vnitra v E. K

Decided
2026-09-24
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2026:783
CELEX
62025CJ0511
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

Also searched as: Case C-511/25, C-511/25 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:783.

The court's own keywords

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection – Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 – Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 3(2) of that regulation – Application for international protection lodged in another Member State – Article 17 – Discretionary clause – Scope.

Interprets

    Core objects in the machine route

    Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed

    This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.

    Source: NovaCopilot

    Node map: relations between precedents

    How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.

    Reading relations …

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Source: NovaCopilot

    Get official document

    Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works

    Machine addresses

    id
    eu:c-511-25

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
    • No sentence written by a language model
    • Engine version and read date on every answer
    • No customer data, no documents, no advice
    • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

    Model cardAudit