Agent · ai-act-2024-1689-75

AI Act artikel 75: Mutual assistance, market surveillance and control of general-purpose AI systems

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

CELEX 32024R1689 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk

ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.

What this page is: Agent, AI Act artikel 75
Checked against the official source: 2026-08-18Current
Responsible publisher: ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position

Short answer

What does AI Act Article 75 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?

AI Act Article 75 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 3 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-18 against CELEX 32024R1689. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.

AI Act Article 75Checked against the publisher 2026-08-18Official text

Paragraph 1 applies. 1. Where an AI system is based on a general-purpose AI model, and the model and the system are developed by the same provider, the AI Office shall have powers to monitor and supervise compliance of that AI system with obligations under this Regulation. To carry out its monitoring and supervision tasks, the AI Office shall have all the powers of a market surveillance authority provided for in this Section and Regulati…
Paragraph 2 applies. 2. Where the relevant market surveillance authorities have sufficient reason to consider general-purpose AI systems that can be used directly by deployers for at least one purpose that is classified as high-risk pursuant to this Regulation to be non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, they shall cooperate with the AI Office to carry out compliance evaluations, and shall inform the Board and…
Paragraph 3 applies. 3. Where a market surveillance authority is unable to conclude its investigation of the high-risk AI system because of its inability to access certain information related to the general-purpose AI model despite having made all appropriate efforts to obtain that information, it may submit a reasoned request to the AI Office, by which access to that information shall be enforced. In that case, the AI Office shall suppl…

A source reference, not legal advice.

Jurisdiction

The same agent, read through one country's lens.

Inputs

in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3)

Rule tree

If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. Where an AI system is based on a general-purpose AI model, and the model and the system are developed by the same provider, the AI Office shall have powers to monitor and supervise compliance of that AI system with obligations under this Regulation. To carry out its monitoring and supervision tasks, the AI Office shall have all the powers of a market surveillance authority provided for in this Section and Regulati…
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. Where the relevant market surveillance authorities have sufficient reason to consider general-purpose AI systems that can be used directly by deployers for at least one purpose that is classified as high-risk pursuant to this Regulation to be non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, they shall cooperate with the AI Office to carry out compliance evaluations, and shall inform the Board and…
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
3. Where a market surveillance authority is unable to conclude its investigation of the high-risk AI system because of its inability to access certain information related to the general-purpose AI model despite having made all appropriate efforts to obtain that information, it may submit a reasoned request to the AI Office, by which access to that information shall be enforced. In that case, the AI Office shall suppl…
Paragraph 3

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

11. Where an AI system is based on a general-purpose AI model, and the model and the system are developed by the same provider, the AI Office shall have powers to monitor and supervise compliance of that AI system with obligations under this Regulation. To carry out its monitoring and supervision tasks, the AI Office shall have all the powers of a market surveillance authority provided for in this Section and Regulation (EU) 2019/1020.
22. Where the relevant market surveillance authorities have sufficient reason to consider general-purpose AI systems that can be used directly by deployers for at least one purpose that is classified as high-risk pursuant to this Regulation to be non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation, they shall cooperate with the AI Office to carry out compliance evaluations, and shall inform the Board and other market surveillance authorities accordingly.
33. Where a market surveillance authority is unable to conclude its investigation of the high-risk AI system because of its inability to access certain information related to the general-purpose AI model despite having made all appropriate efforts to obtain that information, it may submit a reasoned request to the AI Office, by which access to that information shall be enforced. In that case, the AI Office shall supply to the applicant authority without delay, and in any event within 30 days, any information that the AI Office considers to be relevant in order to establish whether a high-risk AI system is non-compliant. Market surveillance authorities shall safeguard the confidentiality of the information that they obtain in accordance with Article 78 of this Regulation. The procedure provided for in Chapter VI of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 shall apply mutatis mutandis.

Lineage

treatyTFEU art. 288 (förordning)

act32024R1689

chapterIX. Post-market monitoring, information sharing and market surveillance

article75

paragraphs3

jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)

supervisorEDPB — European Data Protection Board

national—

Interface

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/ai-act-2024-1689-75/run

methodGET

outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash

Quota60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel

stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hashes

textsha256:e1c395edbbf9bfe47bb71500b162b6fb40b2146539256dc6d5c5d0a52706bc13

scriptsha256:d25282cdf0c2b5d0531390ed665b8b43db06eaf8c7ce0acfcbad86e8893f9ac1

enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0

agentsha256:c050947dbb7b2eaa8420ce6ef1ff61382cd770b5fc1bfccaf895d463219fd5ec

versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-08-25 / c050947dbb7b2eaa

Artefacts

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32024R1689 art. 75, Mutual assistance, market surveillance and control of general-purpose AI systems. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-75 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:62947e35aa962bff, bygge legal-2026-08-25).