Agent · ai-act-2024-1689-37

AI Act artikel 37: Challenge to the competence of notified bodies

What is an agent? Agents execute decisions.

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

Also searched as: EU AI Act article 37 · Artificial Intelligence Act article 37 · Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 article 37

CELEX 32024R1689 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 88 · minimal-risk

PremiumHand written or high weight rule tree. Metered per call at the edge once metering is switched on, at the same address and with the same answer as today.

AI ActOfficial source

Inputs

• in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
• punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4)

Rule tree

1. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)

   Paragraph 1 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

   1. The Commission shall, where necessary, investigate all cases where there are reasons to doubt the competence of a notified body or the continued fulfilment by a notified body of the requirements laid down in Article 31 and of its applicable responsibilities.

   Paragraph 1

2. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)

   Paragraph 2 applies

   2. The notifying authority shall provide the Commission, on request, with all relevant information relating to the notification or the maintenance of the competence of the notified body concerned.

   Paragraph 2

3. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)

   Paragraph 3 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

   3. The Commission shall ensure that all sensitive information obtained in the course of its investigations pursuant to this Article is treated confidentially in accordance with Article 78.

   Paragraph 3

4. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)

   Paragraph 4 applies

   4. Where the Commission ascertains that a notified body does not meet or no longer meets the requirements for its notification, it shall inform the notifying Member State accordingly and request it to take the necessary corrective measures, including the suspension or withdrawal of the notification if necessary. Where the Member State fails to take the necessary corrective measures, the Commission may, by means of an…

   Paragraph 4

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

1. 11. The Commission shall, where necessary, investigate all cases where there are reasons to doubt the competence of a notified body or the continued fulfilment by a notified body of the requirements laid down in Article 31 and of its applicable responsibilities.
2. 22. The notifying authority shall provide the Commission, on request, with all relevant information relating to the notification or the maintenance of the competence of the notified body concerned.
3. 33. The Commission shall ensure that all sensitive information obtained in the course of its investigations pursuant to this Article is treated confidentially in accordance with Article 78.
4. 44. Where the Commission ascertains that a notified body does not meet or no longer meets the requirements for its notification, it shall inform the notifying Member State accordingly and request it to take the necessary corrective measures, including the suspension or withdrawal of the notification if necessary. Where the Member State fails to take the necessary corrective measures, the Commission may, by means of an implementing act, suspend, restrict or withdraw the designation. That implementing act shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 98(2).

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32024R1689 art. 37, Challenge to the competence of notified bodies. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-37 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:ace9bd712d9680a9, bygge legal-2026-11-02).