Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Agent · ai-act-2024-1689-27

AI Act artikel 27: Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

CELEX 32024R1689 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 88 · minimal-risk

PremiumHand written or high weight rule tree. Metered per call at the edge once metering is switched on, at the same address and with the same answer as today.

AI ActOfficial source

What this page is
Agent, AI Act artikel 27
Checked against the official source
2026-08-18Current
Responsible publisher
ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position

Jurisdiction

The same agent, read through one country's lens.

Inputs

  • in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
  • punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14)

Rule tree

  1. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)

    Paragraph 1 applies

    1. Prior to deploying a high-risk AI system referred to in Article 6(2), with the exception of high-risk AI systems intended to be used in the area listed in point 2 of Annex III, deployers that are bodies governed by public law, or are private entities providing public services, and deployers of high-risk AI systems referred to in points 5 (b) and (c) of Annex III, shall perform an assessment of the impact on fundam…

    Paragraph 1

  2. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)

    Paragraph 2 applies

    (a)

    Paragraph 2

  3. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)

    Paragraph 3 applies

    a description of the deployer’s processes in which the high-risk AI system will be used in line with its intended purpose;

    Paragraph 3

  4. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)

    Paragraph 4 applies

    (b)

    Paragraph 4

  5. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)

    Paragraph 5 applies

    a description of the period of time within which, and the frequency with which, each high-risk AI system is intended to be used;

    Paragraph 5

  6. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)

    Paragraph 6 applies

    (c)

    Paragraph 6

  7. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 7)

    Paragraph 7 applies

    the categories of natural persons and groups likely to be affected by its use in the specific context;

    Paragraph 7

  8. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 8)

    Paragraph 8 applies

    (d)

    Paragraph 8

  9. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 9)

    Paragraph 9 applies

    the specific risks of harm likely to have an impact on the categories of natural persons or groups of persons identified pursuant to point (c) of this paragraph, taking into account the information given by the provider pursuant to Article 13;

    Paragraph 9

  10. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 10)

    Paragraph 10 applies

    (e)

    Paragraph 10

  11. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 11)

    Paragraph 11 applies

    a description of the implementation of human oversight measures, according to the instructions for use;

    Paragraph 11

  12. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 12)

    Paragraph 12 applies

    (f)

    Paragraph 12

  13. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 13)

    Paragraph 13 applies

    the measures to be taken in the case of the materialisation of those risks, including the arrangements for internal governance and complaint mechanisms.

    Paragraph 13

  14. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 14)

    Paragraph 14 applies

    2. The obligation laid down in paragraph 1 applies to the first use of the high-risk AI system. The deployer may, in similar cases, rely on previously conducted fundamental rights impact assessments or existing impact assessments carried out by provider. If, during the use of the high-risk AI system, the deployer considers that any of the elements listed in paragraph 1 has changed or is no longer up to date, the depl…

    Paragraph 14

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

  1. 11. Prior to deploying a high-risk AI system referred to in Article 6(2), with the exception of high-risk AI systems intended to be used in the area listed in point 2 of Annex III, deployers that are bodies governed by public law, or are private entities providing public services, and deployers of high-risk AI systems referred to in points 5 (b) and (c) of Annex III, shall perform an assessment of the impact on fundamental rights that the use of such system may produce. For that purpose, deployers shall perform an assessment consisting of:
  2. 2(a)
  3. 3a description of the deployer’s processes in which the high-risk AI system will be used in line with its intended purpose;
  4. 4(b)
  5. 5a description of the period of time within which, and the frequency with which, each high-risk AI system is intended to be used;
  6. 6(c)
  7. 7the categories of natural persons and groups likely to be affected by its use in the specific context;
  8. 8(d)
  9. 9the specific risks of harm likely to have an impact on the categories of natural persons or groups of persons identified pursuant to point (c) of this paragraph, taking into account the information given by the provider pursuant to Article 13;
  10. 10(e)
  11. 11a description of the implementation of human oversight measures, according to the instructions for use;
  12. 12(f)
  13. 13the measures to be taken in the case of the materialisation of those risks, including the arrangements for internal governance and complaint mechanisms.
  14. 142. The obligation laid down in paragraph 1 applies to the first use of the high-risk AI system. The deployer may, in similar cases, rely on previously conducted fundamental rights impact assessments or existing impact assessments carried out by provider. If, during the use of the high-risk AI system, the deployer considers that any of the elements listed in paragraph 1 has changed or is no longer up to date, the deployer shall take the necessary steps to update the information.

Lineage

treatyTFEU art. 288 (förordning)
act32024R1689
chapterIII. High-risk AI systems
article27
paragraphs14
jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)
supervisorEDPB — European Data Protection Board
national

Interface

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/ai-act-2024-1689-27/run
methodGET
outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash
Quota60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel
stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hashes

textsha256:1a1ce5123cbe57b599ff9d405a1c776d56bc913ede5e7b50bfdde5fca8aa80f4
scriptsha256:1384a1afd78aac00ddd84d9df09fdf2c5bde23eaaae7ab4687472888410d604e
enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0
agentsha256:c185f9717e033b156a6df3137f38b768c16e2f4687dbaad9523da9d3be1e8e88
versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-08-25 / c185f9717e033b15

Artefacts

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32024R1689 art. 27, Fundamental rights impact assessment for high-risk AI systems. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-27 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:928cd3334926b3a1, bygge legal-2026-08-25).