Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

All US rules

Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act

Utah Code § 13-72 · Read 2026-08-15

In force since 1 May 2024. The act ties generative AI to existing consumer protection law and adds a disclosure duty, with a heavier duty in regulated occupations.

Identifier

Identifier
Utah Code § 13-72
Level
State UT
Status
In force
Adopted
2024-03-13
Applies from
2024-05-01
Supervisory bodies
Utah DCP

Named requirements

  • No defence for the system

    Utah Code § 13-72-101

    A person cannot rely on generative AI as a defence for a statement that breaches consumer protection law.

  • Disclosure on request

    Utah Code § 13-72-201

    A clear statement that the counterpart is a generative AI system when the consumer asks.

  • Regulated occupations

    Utah Code § 13-72-202

    Prominent disclosure at the start of the interaction in occupations that require a licence.

Official source

EU acts on the same ground

  • ai-act

    Article 50 of the AI Act carries the same idea of transparency towards the person interacting with the system.

Change monitoring

The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

Change monitoring
FieldValue
RegisterUtah DCP, Utah Code § 13-72
PublisherUtah Division of Consumer Protection
Last read2026-08-15
IntervalEvery 30 days
Next re-read2026-09-14
StatusRe-read overdue
Open the register at the publisher

Row history

Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

Row history
DateEventSource
2026-08-15Row read against the official publicationUtah Division of Consumer Protection
2024-05-01Date of application according to the publisherUtah Division of Consumer Protection
2024-03-13Adopted under Utah Code § 13-72Utah Division of Consumer Protection

Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

Utah Code § 13-72, Utah Artificial Intelligence Policy Act. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/us/regler/utah-ai-policy-act (hämtad 2026-11-02, bevis sha256:033ca00b61de4b4e, bygge legal-2026-11-02).

sha256:
033ca00b61de4b4e06a69e950ba57a3dc72a32362413e829391b9f96a646edd8
hämtad:
2026-11-02
source_confidence:
derived
bygge:
legal-2026-11-02

Derived path to the publisher. The address is built from the identifier and lands in the publisher's own register. le.utah.gov.

The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit