Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

RH 2019:39

Om sökanden, som förelagts via e-post, haft laga förfall

Talan har avvisats på grund av underlåtenhet att betala tilläggsavgift. Fråga om sökanden, som förelagts via e-post, haft laga förfall.

Core question

Fråga om sökanden, som förelagts via e-post, haft laga förfall

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Talan har avvisats på grund av underlåtenhet att betala tilläggsavgift.

  2. Why it matters

    Decision by Göta hovrätt, 2019.

Risk profile of the decision

LowThe decision carries little weight when relied upon alone. Read it together with the statute and later decisions.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (0)

    Questions (0)

      Agent commands

      • runCaseSummary()

        The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

      • runLegalImpact()

        Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

      • runObligationCheck()

        Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

      • runProofVerify()

        Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

      https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2019-39/manifest.json

      Court
      Göta hovrätt
      Decided
      2019-09-10
      Applies
      0

      Mål nr Ö 2052-19

      • 32 kap. 6 § rättegångsbalken (1942:740)
      Göta hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar

      Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

      Statutes

        Case law read on 2026-08-29.

        Change monitoring

        The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

        Change monitoring
        FieldValue
        RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        PublisherSveriges Domstolar
        Last read2026-08-29
        IntervalEvery 30 days
        Next re-read2026-09-28
        StatusChecked against the publisher
        Open the register at the publisher

        Row history

        Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

        Row history
        DateEventSource
        2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        2019-09-10Date of decision according to Göta hovrättGöta hovrätt

        Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

        The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

        RH 2019:39, Talan har avvisats på grund av underlåtenhet att betala tilläggsavgift. Fråga om sökanden, som förelagts via e-post, haft laga förfall.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-39 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:be809221ed622151, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

        sha256:
        be809221ed622151816cbddc70b1d54c0a49ee1caa4376189c77822f7573a7ab
        hämtad:
        2026-08-25
        source_confidence:
        official
        bygge:
        legal-2026-08-25

        Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Göta hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar.

        The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.