Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
ExploreWorldAIExploreWorldAI

RH 2011:1

Tingsrättens underlåtenhet att inhämta erforderlig utredning i påföljdsfrågan har ansetts utgöra rättegångsfel som inte utan väsentlig…

Tingsrättens underlåtenhet att inhämta erforderlig utredning i påföljdsfrågan har ansetts utgöra rättegångsfel som inte utan väsentlig olägenhet kan avhjälpas i hovrätten.

The decision in three points

  1. What the court said

    Tingsrättens underlåtenhet att inhämta erforderlig utredning i påföljdsfrågan har ansetts utgöra rättegångsfel som inte utan väsentlig olägenhet kan avhjälpas i hovrätten.

  2. Why it matters

    Decision by Svea hovrätt, 2011.

Risk profile of the decision

LowThe decision carries little weight when relied upon alone. Read it together with the statute and later decisions.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (0)

    Questions (0)

      Agent commands

      • runCaseSummary()

        The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

      • runLegalImpact()

        Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

      • runObligationCheck()

        Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

      • runProofVerify()

        Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

      https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2011-1/manifest.json

      Court
      Svea hovrätt
      Decided
      2011-02-17
      Applies
      0

      Mål nr B 9927-10

      • 45 kap. 14 § andra stycket och 51 kap. 28 § och 29 § rättegångsbalken (1942:740)
      • 1 § och 2 § lagen (1991:2041) om särskild personutredning i brottmål m.m.
      Svea hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar

      Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

      Statutes

        Case law read on 2026-08-29.

        Change monitoring

        The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

        Change monitoring
        FieldValue
        RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        PublisherSveriges Domstolar
        Last read2026-08-29
        IntervalEvery 30 days
        Next re-read2026-09-28
        StatusChecked against the publisher
        Open the register at the publisher

        Row history

        Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

        Row history
        DateEventSource
        2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        2011-02-17Date of decision according to Svea hovrättSvea hovrätt

        Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

        Cite this row

        The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

        RH 2011:1, Tingsrättens underlåtenhet att inhämta erforderlig utredning i påföljdsfrågan har ansetts utgöra rättegångsfel som inte utan väsentlig olägenhet kan avhjälpas i hovrätten.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2011-1 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:7627eaa27275a3b3, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

        Machine addressHow to cite the platform
        sha256:
        7627eaa27275a3b3cf9afac8f0d322c3ab83615fac9a57721776b2d2cd4eb9e3
        hämtad:
        2026-08-25
        source_confidence:
        official
        bygge:
        legal-2026-08-25
        officiell källa:
        https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/8e23a0c0-0839-4853-8aa4-287a4ae3e871

        Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Svea hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar.

        The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.