RH 2008:57
RH 2008:57, Hovrätten för Västra Sverige (2008)
Judgment of Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2008. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.
Original headnote (Swedish)
I ett utmätningsmål gör gäldenären invändning om preskription. I målet uppstår fråga om borgenären lagt fram tillräcklig bevisning för att preskriptionsavbrott skall anses ha skett.
The decision in three points
What happened
I ett utmätningsmål gör gäldenären invändning om preskription.
What the court said
I målet uppstår fråga om borgenären lagt fram tillräcklig bevisning för att preskriptionsavbrott skall anses ha skett.
Why it matters
Decision by Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, 2008.
Risk profile of the decision
LowThe decision carries little weight when relied upon alone. Read it together with the statute and later decisions.
Relations of the decision in the graph
Agent commands
- runCaseSummary()
The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.
- runLegalImpact()
Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.
- runObligationCheck()
Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.
- runProofVerify()
Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.
https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2008-57/manifest.json
NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.
- Court
- Hovrätten för Västra Sverige
- Decided
- 2008-08-04
- Applies
- 0
Mål nr ÖÄ 2215-08
Also searched as: RH 2008 57, Rättsfall från hovrätterna 2008:57, Swedish judgment RH 2008:57, Case RH 2008:57, RH 2008:57 2008, ÖÄ 2215-08, Case ÖÄ 2215-08.
- 5 § preskriptionslagen (1981:130)
Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.
Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, Sveriges DomstolarOfficial publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.
Verified, unchanged
Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20
Statutes
Case law read on 2026-09-05.
Change monitoring
The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| Publisher | Sveriges Domstolar |
| Last read | 2026-09-05 |
| Interval | Every 30 days |
| Next re-read | 2026-10-05 |
| Status | Re-read scheduled |
Row history
Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-05 | Row read against the courts' own register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| 2008-08-04 | Date of decision according to Hovrätten för Västra Sverige | Hovrätten för Västra Sverige |
Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.
What changed this week, every Monday
A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.
Cite this row
The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.
RH 2008:57, I ett utmätningsmål gör gäldenären invändning om preskription. I målet uppstår fråga om borgenären lagt fram tillräcklig bevisning för att preskriptionsavbrott skall anses ha skett.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2008-57 (hämtad 2026-10-18, bevis sha256:4c307485697e616c, bygge legal-2026-10-18).
- sha256:
- 4c307485697e616cfaad9c4b7106997a38d527ddeb70e1e798e7560441764421
- hämtad:
- 2026-10-18
- source_confidence:
- official
- bygge:
- legal-2026-10-18
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Hovrätten för Västra Sverige, Sveriges Domstolar.
The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.