Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

NJA 2025:1

Om ett olaga intrång som har skett genom inbrott ska bedömas som grovt

Fråga om ett olaga intrång som har skett genom inbrott ska bedömas som grovt.

Core question

Fråga om ett olaga intrång som har skett genom inbrott ska bedömas som grovt

The decision in three points

  1. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 2025.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden

Relations of the decision in the graph

Agent commands

  • runCaseSummary()

    The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

  • runLegalImpact()

    Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

  • runObligationCheck()

    Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

  • runProofVerify()

    Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2025-1/manifest.json

Court
Supreme Court of Sweden
Decided
2025-01-03
Applies
0

Mål nr B 3779-24

  • 4 kap. 6 § brottsbalken (1962:700)
Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

Statutes

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2025-01-03Date of decision according to Högsta domstolenHögsta domstolen

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    NJA 2025:1, Fråga om ett olaga intrång som har skett genom inbrott ska bedömas som grovt.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2025-1 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:1ac5f385c7670a1f, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    sha256:
    1ac5f385c7670a1f7d6570a25866cd393e6df63b360457b4ff93511f3a1181c3
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.