Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

The data engine is updated daily with thousands of new legal data points that strengthen society's decision support

NJA 2012 s. 953

NJA 2012 s. 953, Supreme Court of Sweden (2012)

Judgment of Supreme Court of Sweden, 2012. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Den som enligt godtrosförvärvslagen kunnat göra gällande äganderätt till stulen egendom men försummat detta anses inte ha drabbats av någon skada av att egendomen har utmätts och sålts. Även fråga om undersökningsskyldighet för Kronofogdemyndigheten vid utmätning av egendom som kan vara stulen.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Även fråga om undersökningsskyldighet för Kronofogdemyndigheten vid utmätning av egendom som kan vara stulen.

  2. What the court said

    Den som enligt godtrosförvärvslagen kunnat göra gällande äganderätt till stulen egendom men försummat detta anses inte ha drabbats av någon skada av att egendomen har utmätts och sålts.

  3. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 2012.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (0)

    Questions (0)

      Agent commands

      • runCaseSummary()

        The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

      • runLegalImpact()

        Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

      • runObligationCheck()

        Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

      • runProofVerify()

        Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

      https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2012-s-953/manifest.json

      The full basis, ready-made

      EU judgment pack (C cases), total 48.75 € (about 53 USD)

      Evidence chain and hash per row included. One-time purchase, delivered instantly.

      Open the pack
      Court
      Supreme Court of Sweden
      Decided
      2012-12-20
      Applies
      0

      Mål nr T 1467-11

      Also searched as: NJA 2012 s 953, NJA 2012:953, NJA 2012 953, Nytt juridiskt arkiv 2012 s 953, Swedish judgment NJA 2012 s 953, Case NJA 2012 s. 953, NJA 2012 s. 953 2012, T 1467-11.

      • 3 kap. 2 § skadeståndslagen (1972:207)
      • 4 kap. 18 § utsökningsbalken (1981:774)
      • 3 § lagen (1986:796) om godtrosförvärv
      Hämta hela domen

      Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

      Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

      Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

      Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20

      Next check 2026-10-20 · Fresh

      See the open quality meter

      Statutes

        Case law read on 2026-09-05.

        Change monitoring

        The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

        Change monitoring
        FieldValue
        RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        PublisherSveriges Domstolar
        Last read2026-09-05
        IntervalEvery 30 days
        Next re-read2026-10-05
        StatusChecked against the publisher
        Open the register at the publisher

        Row history

        Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

        Row history
        DateEventSource
        2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        2012-12-20Date of decision according to Högsta domstolenHögsta domstolen

        Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

        Cite this row

        The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

        NJA 2012 s. 953, Den som enligt godtrosförvärvslagen kunnat göra gällande äganderätt till stulen egendom men försummat detta anses inte ha drabbats av någon skada av att egendomen har utmätts och sålts. Även fråga om undersökningsskyldighet för Kronofogdemyndigheten vid utmätning av egendom som kan vara stulen.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2012-s-953 (hämtad 2026-09-26, bevis sha256:f9bb062d3e4c9a6b, bygge legal-2026-09-26).

        Machine addressHow to cite the platform
        sha256:
        f9bb062d3e4c9a6bf9fdb40495f4eed487d1d2a228fe3e863121ec0bd3172d80
        hämtad:
        2026-09-26
        source_confidence:
        official
        bygge:
        legal-2026-09-26
        officiell källa:
        https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/b62862bd-2afd-483c-a7c9-15e2a7e539f6

        Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

        The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.