NJA 2023:81
Om det har funnits hinder mot att verkställa en skiljedom avseende parts skyldighet att ersätta motparten för skiljedomskostnader i form av…
Fråga om det har funnits hinder mot att verkställa en skiljedom avseende parts skyldighet att ersätta motparten för skiljedomskostnader i form av skiljemannaarvode och avgift till ett skiljedomsinstitut.
Core question
Fråga om det har funnits hinder mot att verkställa en skiljedom avseende parts skyldighet att ersätta motparten för skiljedomskostnader i form av skiljemannaarvode och avgift till ett skiljedomsinstitut
The decision in three points
Why it matters
Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 2023.
Risk profile of the decision
MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.
- Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden
Relations of the decision in the graph
Statutes (0)
Questions (0)
Decisions (4)
Agent commands
- runCaseSummary()
The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.
- runLegalImpact()
Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.
- runObligationCheck()
Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.
- runProofVerify()
Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.
https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2023-81/manifest.json
- Court
- Supreme Court of Sweden
- Decided
- 2023-12-27
- Applies
- 0
Mål nr Ä 2885-23
- 42 § lagen (1999:116) om skiljeförfarande
- 37 § lagen (1999:116) om skiljeförfarande
- 3 kap. 15 § utsökningsbalken (1981:774)
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.
Statutes
Case law read on 2026-08-29.
Change monitoring
The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| Publisher | Sveriges Domstolar |
| Last read | 2026-08-29 |
| Interval | Every 30 days |
| Next re-read | 2026-09-28 |
| Status | Checked against the publisher |
Row history
Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-29 | Row read against the courts' own register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| 2023-12-27 | Date of decision according to Högsta domstolen | Högsta domstolen |
Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.
Cite this row
The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.
NJA 2023:81, Fråga om det har funnits hinder mot att verkställa en skiljedom avseende parts skyldighet att ersätta motparten för skiljedomskostnader i form av skiljemannaarvode och avgift till ett skiljedomsinstitut.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2023-81 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:20246b687e3cbd24, bygge legal-2026-08-25).
- sha256:
- 20246b687e3cbd2404ac8303226eba14f32db6f73a83fe738196213f6aeb895b
- hämtad:
- 2026-08-25
- source_confidence:
- official
- bygge:
- legal-2026-08-25
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.
The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.