Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

NovaCopilot's registers are reviewed daily against official sources

NJA 2011 s. 248

NJA 2011 s. 248, Supreme Court of Sweden (2011)

Judgment of Supreme Court of Sweden, 2011. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

I ett ärende om överklagande av beslut om rättelse av fastighetsregistrets inskrivningsdel har Kammarkollegiet ansetts ha yttrat sig i syfte att tillvarata intresset av ett korrekt fört fastighetsregister. Kammarkollegiet har därmed inte intagit sådan ställning av part att kollegiet kunnat åläggas att ersätta parts rättegångskostnad.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Kammarkollegiet har därmed inte intagit sådan ställning av part att kollegiet kunnat åläggas att ersätta parts rättegångskostnad.

  2. What the court said

    I ett ärende om överklagande av beslut om rättelse av fastighetsregistrets inskrivningsdel har Kammarkollegiet ansetts ha yttrat sig i syfte att tillvarata intresset av ett korrekt fört fastighetsregister.

  3. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 2011.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (0)

    Questions (0)

      Agent commands

      • runCaseSummary()

        The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

      • runLegalImpact()

        Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

      • runObligationCheck()

        Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

      • runProofVerify()

        Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

      https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2011-s-248/manifest.json

      NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

      NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

      Common questions

      What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

      Source: NovaCopilot

      NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

      Court
      Supreme Court of Sweden
      Decided
      2011-05-03
      Applies
      0

      Mål nr Ö 3939-08

      Also searched as: NJA 2011 s 248, NJA 2011:248, NJA 2011 248, Nytt juridiskt arkiv 2011 s 248, Swedish judgment NJA 2011 s 248, Case NJA 2011 s. 248, NJA 2011 s. 248 2011, Ö 3939-08.

      • 19 kap. 22 § och 24 § jordabalken (1970:994)
      • 19 kap. 32 § jordabalken i dess lydelse före 1 juni 2008 (1970:994)
      • 21 § lag (1946:804) om införande av nya rättegångsbalken
      • 18 kap. 16 § rättegångsbalken (1942:740)
      Hämta hela domen

      Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

      Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

      Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

      Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20

      Next check 2026-10-20 · Fresh

      See the open quality meter

      Statutes

        Case law read on 2026-09-05.

        Change monitoring

        The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

        Change monitoring
        FieldValue
        RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        PublisherSveriges Domstolar
        Last read2026-09-05
        IntervalEvery 30 days
        Next re-read2026-10-05
        StatusRe-read scheduled
        Open the register at the publisher

        Row history

        Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

        Row history
        DateEventSource
        2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        2011-05-03Date of decision according to Högsta domstolenHögsta domstolen

        Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

        What changed this week, every Monday

        A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

        Topics

        Cite this row

        The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

        NJA 2011 s. 248, I ett ärende om överklagande av beslut om rättelse av fastighetsregistrets inskrivningsdel har Kammarkollegiet ansetts ha yttrat sig i syfte att tillvarata intresset av ett korrekt fört fastighetsregister. Kammarkollegiet har därmed inte intagit sådan ställning av part att kollegiet kunnat åläggas att ersätta parts rättegångskostnad.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2011-s-248 (hämtad 2026-10-06, bevis sha256:4bd7cd1a37c2e3c2, bygge legal-2026-10-06).

        Machine addressHow to cite the platform
        sha256:
        4bd7cd1a37c2e3c24895a166ea32e41175e246e23c46f4e176d7975e39f0421a
        hämtad:
        2026-10-06
        source_confidence:
        official
        bygge:
        legal-2026-10-06
        officiell källa:
        https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/2cc54e2e-75e3-4d6a-bf74-ea507ce0ed00

        Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

        The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.