Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

MIG 2012:19

Det har inte heller funnits rimliga tvivel på hennes avsikt att lämna medlemsstaternas territorium före viseringstidens slut

En kvinna som ansökt om en Schengenvisering enligt bestämmelserna i viseringskodexen har styrkt det uppgivna syftet med sin resa till Sverige. Det har inte heller funnits rimliga tvivel på hennes avsikt att lämna medlemsstaternas territorium före viseringstidens slut.

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    En kvinna som ansökt om en Schengenvisering enligt bestämmelserna i viseringskodexen har styrkt det uppgivna syftet med sin resa till Sverige.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Migration Court of Appeal, 2012. Applies Utlänningslagen.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Migration Court of Appeal
  • Applies one statute
  • 557 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about family and migration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/mig-2012-19/manifest.json

    Court
    Migration Court of Appeal
    Decided
    2012-10-12
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr UM 6594-11

    • 1 kap. 4 a §, 2 kap. 3 § och 3 kap. 1 § utlänningslagen (2005:716)
    Migrationsöverdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2012-10-12Date of decision according to MigrationsöverdomstolenMigrationsöverdomstolen
    2006-03-31Applied statute in force: SFS 2005:716Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    MIG 2012:19, En kvinna som ansökt om en Schengenvisering enligt bestämmelserna i viseringskodexen har styrkt det uppgivna syftet med sin resa till Sverige. Det har inte heller funnits rimliga tvivel på hennes avsikt att lämna medlemsstaternas territorium före viseringstidens slut.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/mig-2012-19 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:581ef0b86b94d120, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    sha256:
    581ef0b86b94d120b5c3a25a810d54d7fcb2b7a0e17cb3686eeb5ad8d319cdb9
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Migrationsöverdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.