HFD 2011 ref. 15
HFD 2011 ref. 15, Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden (2011)
Judgment of Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden, 2011. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.
Original headnote (Swedish)
Den omständigheten att en ledamot av kammarrätten objektivt sett varit jävig har inte ansetts utgöra grund för resning.
The decision in three points
What the court said
Den omständigheten att en ledamot av kammarrätten objektivt sett varit jävig har inte ansetts utgöra grund för resning.
Why it matters
Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden, 2011.
Risk profile of the decision
MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.
- Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
Relations of the decision in the graph
Statutes (0)
Questions (0)
Decisions (4)
Agent commands
- runCaseSummary()
The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.
- runLegalImpact()
Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.
- runObligationCheck()
Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.
- runProofVerify()
Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.
https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2011-15/manifest.json
NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.
- Court
- Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
- Decided
- 2011-03-15
- Applies
- 0
Mål nr 6002-10
Also searched as: HFD 2011 ref 15, HFD 2011:15, HFD 2011 15, Högsta förvaltningsdomstolens årsbok 2011 ref 15, Swedish judgment HFD 2011 ref 15, Case HFD 2011 ref. 15, HFD 2011 ref. 15 2011, 6002-10.
- 4 kap. 13 § rättegångsbalken (1942:740)
- 37 b § och 41 § förvaltningsprocesslagen (1971:291)
Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.
Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Sveriges DomstolarOfficial publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.
Verified, unchanged
Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20
Statutes
Case law read on 2026-09-05.
Change monitoring
The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| Publisher | Sveriges Domstolar |
| Last read | 2026-09-05 |
| Interval | Every 30 days |
| Next re-read | 2026-10-05 |
| Status | Re-read scheduled |
Row history
Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-05 | Row read against the courts' own register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| 2011-03-15 | Date of decision according to Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen | Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen |
Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.
What changed this week, every Monday
A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.
Cite this row
The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.
HFD 2011 ref. 15, Den omständigheten att en ledamot av kammarrätten objektivt sett varit jävig har inte ansetts utgöra grund för resning.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2011-15 (hämtad 2026-10-18, bevis sha256:a892f1f675b8f7f8, bygge legal-2026-10-18).
- sha256:
- a892f1f675b8f7f8272450e1ca0c855a803acd7a03f45aecba6b75cb4352457a
- hämtad:
- 2026-10-18
- source_confidence:
- official
- bygge:
- legal-2026-10-18
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.
The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.