Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-362/21EKOFRUKT v Direktor na Direktsia „Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika“ – Veliko Tarnovo
- Decided
- 2022-10-20
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2022:815
- CELEX
- 62021CJ0362
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Internal market – Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 – Article 3(12) – Concept of ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Article 25(1) – Article 26 – Annex I – Legal effects of electronic signatures – Requirements relating to an advanced electronic signature – Administrative act issued in the form of an electronic document signed with an electronic signature not meeting the requirements for a ‘qualified electronic signature’ – Cumulative requirements – Consequences – Article 3(15) – Absence of a ‘qualified certificate for electronic signature’ – Entry of a qualified electronic signature in the certificate issued by the trust service provider – Effect – Names of the holder of the electronic signature which have been transliterated using Latin script rather than being written in Cyrillic script as they normally are.
Interprets
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Six fixed blocks, one source per line
- No sentence written by a language model
- Engine version and read date on every answer
- No customer data, no documents, no advice
- Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act