Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-249/25Minister van Asiel en Migratie v UB
- Decided
- 2026-10-01
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2026:806
- CELEX
- 62025CJ0249
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-249/25, C-249/25 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:806.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Asylum policy – Directive 2001/55/EC – Minimum standards for giving temporary protection in the event of a mass influx of displaced persons and measures promoting a balance of efforts between Member States in receiving such persons and bearing the consequences thereof – Article 17(2) – Directive 2013/32/EU – Common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection – Granting of international protection to a person enjoying temporary protection under Directive 2001/55 – Article 31 – National administrative practice of suspending, during the temporary protection period, the running of the time limit for taking a decision on an application for international protection.
Interprets
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-249-25
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Six fixed blocks, one source per line
- No sentence written by a language model
- Engine version and read date on every answer
- No customer data, no documents, no advice
- Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act