Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-386/24Centro Petroli Roma Srl v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli
- Decided
- 2026-06-11
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2026:471
- CELEX
- 62024CJ0386
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-386/24, C-386/24 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:471.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rule of law – Judicial independence – Article 267 TFEU – Obligation on national courts or tribunals of last instance to make a reference for a preliminary ruling – Individual liability of judges – Taxation – General arrangements for excise duty – Directive 2008/118/EC – Article 16(1) – Tax warehouse – Opening and operation – Authorisation – Conditions – Fixing by national legislation – Distinction according to the storage capacity of warehouses – Criterion relating to the existence of ‘actual operational and supply needs of the installation’ for all warehouses – Additional criterion relating to the delivery of a minimum quantity of products over a reference period or to the dependence on another tax warehouse for small warehouses – Whether justified – Principle of proportionality.
Interprets
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-386-24-62024cj0386
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit