166 statute rows · 1563 EU articles · 10985 rulings from every guiding Swedish court · Updated 2026-08-25
Non-compete clause, does it hold?
Walks the conditions set by section 38 of the Contracts Act and the Trade Secrets Act: protectable secret information, compensation during the binding period and a duration proportionate to the protection.
Step 1 of 4
1.Does the clause protect information actually kept secret with commercial value?
The Swedish Parliament: The Trade Secrets Act protects information the holder has taken reasonable steps to keep secret and whose disclosure is liable to cause harm. source
2.Is compensation paid to the employee during the binding period?
Swedish Labour Court: The Labour Court weighs compensation during the binding period against the burden on the employee when reasonableness under section 38 of the Contracts Act is tested. source
The Swedish Parliament: Section 38 of the Contracts Act sets no fixed limit. The binding period is tested against what the protection requires in the individual contract. source
4.Did the employee have access to the secret in their role?
European Commission: The Trade Secrets Directive presupposes that protection targets those who actually received the secret in the course of their work. source
The answer is computed once every step is answered.
Judgments in practice
AD 2017 nr 44
Swedish Labour Court · 2017-06-21
A non-compete clause was invoked against a former employee who had joined a competitor.
The court tested the clause's reasonableness against duration, compensation and the employee's position.
A clause without compensation during the binding period carries a heavier burden in the reasonableness test.