Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-60/22UZ v Bundesrepublik Deutschland
- Decided
- 2023-05-04
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2023:373
- CELEX
- 62022CJ0060
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-60/22, C-60/22 2023, ECLI:EU:C:2023:373.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5 – Principles relating to processing – Controllership – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Electronic file compiled by an administrative authority relating to an asylum application – Transmission to the competent national court via an electronic mailbox – Infringement of Articles 26 and 30 – No arrangement determining joint responsibility for processing and maintaining the record of processing activities – Consequences – Article 17(1) – Right to erasure (‘right to be forgotten’) – Article 18(1) – Right to restriction of processing – Concept of ‘unlawful processing’ – Taking into account of the electronic file by a national court – Absence of consent of the data subject.
Interprets
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-60-22
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit