Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Order

C-464/16 PPénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) v European Commission

Decided
2017-04-06
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2017:291
CELEX
62016CO0464
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

The court's own keywords

Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request for access to Commission documents — Refusal — Action for annulment — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation before the EU Courts — Lawyer who is not a third party in relation to the appellant — Action manifestly inadmissible — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.

Interprets

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
    • No sentence written by a language model
    • Engine version and read date on every answer
    • No customer data, no documents, no advice
    • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

    Model cardAudit